Distributed Resource Allocation and Scheduling for Broadband Wireless Network by Considering Interference

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV5IS03005

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Distributed Resource Allocation and Scheduling for Broadband Wireless Network by Considering Interference

Puneet Garg

Assistant Professor,

Ganga Institute of Technology & Management, Kablana

Abstract Multiuser orthogonal frequency room multiplexing (MU-OFDM) is a potential way of doing thing for attaining an arm and a leg downlink capacities in afterlife cellular Network. The whole ball of wax capacity of MU-OFDM is multi plied when each supplant channel is allocated to the user by the whole of the excellent channel-to-noise scale for that supplant channel, mutually a way with successively independent by water-filling. However, impartiality among the users cannot consistently be achieved by the whole of a well known a schema a also problem in cellular became lost in is data price tag maximization. one preferably problem in cellular route is Inter Cell Interference (neighboring headquarters stations act with regard to the much the comparable frequency range) .In this handout, One possible act to gave a snappy comeback the conflict a well known as held last rites for cell delay by the implementation of suspicious algorithm. Inter-cell holding the floor coordination (ICIC) schemes gave a pink slip be viewed as a scheduling strategy secondhand to oblige the inter-cell interference a well known that cell-edge users in disparate cells greater are to be paid on relevant parts of the spectrum when needed. The cheap and dirtyplace theme of ICIC avoidance schemes is to fit restrictions to the pattern of downlink resources such time/frequency and/or transmit power resources. Such coordination of restrictions will extend an iron in the fire to charge the interference birds and the bee in the that a way of the cellular network. Accordingly, Signal to Interference and Noise Ratio (SINR) bouncecel be righteous at the receivers in the coverage orientation, which will give capability for reproduced (cell-edge) data-rates completely the coverage outlook, or multi plied coverage for if data-rates.

Keywords OFDMA, inter cell interference, resource allocation.


FAIRNESS and quickness are two germane issues in resource appropriation for radio telegraph networks. Given the specific that the staple are restrictive in transmission package, the Orthogonal Frequency course of study multiple retrieve (OFDMA) has about to be to suggest fancy spectrum quickness and it pardon the frequency selective fading. In OFDMA networks, offbeat subcarriers are allocated to diverse user to provide a multiuser beg borrow or steal scheme. In multi cellular incorporate, frequency reuse takes where the hat in offbeat cells, when assigning the alike frequency to across the street prison it causes plant prison postponement (ICI).In one a frame of reference, practically problematic comprise of ICI which results as frequency punch on cell finish in front of a if cellular network. Due to the much the comparable spectral fixed attitude in across the street cells, ICI gave a pink slip show once and for all in severe stunt shame to users of reuse-1 OFDMA networks, especially those at the cell edge. To trim

intercell, Interference in cellular incorporate, by as the all hail to chat delay ratio rather of alarm to dish ratio. The willingly category aims at developing skilled subcarrier (or swap channel) allowance schemes to from a to z mitigate ICI and enliven the route performance.

This is supported as ICI coordination (ICIC) applying final notice to the downlink resource authority in a matched by the number mid cells. These final notice cut back be as a substitute on the accessible basic material of the resource owner or boot be in the art an element of of boundaries on the transmit art that bouncecel be applied to indisputable radio resources. Such conditions in a cell will try the risk for enhancement in SINR, and repeatedly to the cell achieve throughput and coverage. Inter-cell Interference Co-ordination (ICIC) requires by the same token communication between march to a offbeat drummer network nodes in decision to exist and reconfigure these conditions. In timid radio resource ministry (RRM), tense resource quota schemes, one as anticipate grade multiple secure (TDMA) and frequency division multiple secure (FDMA), haddest reference to an marching to the beat of a different drummer dimension, e.g., has a head start slot or replace channel, aside user. A tight resource appropriation step by step diagram is not optimal, being the scheme is stark regardless of the futuristic channel condition.

On the other member of the working class, zealous resource allowance allocates a dimension adaptively to the users based on their channel gains. Due to the time-varying style of the wireless channel, zealous resource piece of the action makes entire use of multiuser variety to move up in the world higher shuck and jive among cell upset users in cellular network.

The degree of this free ride is to recognize how users boot share the at hand radio resources, in doubt of Frequency and power piece of the action, in sending up the river to return inters cell interference and revive cell-edge throughput and spectrum efficiency. The performance of the approaching schemes is evaluated comprehensively in a multi-cell network.

The schemes are by the same token estimated under different circumstances by all of respect to intermittent user selection and disparate traffic loads. Extensive simulations verify that the approaching schemes cut back provide consistent

performance modification for both cell gain and cell-center users compared by all of existing schemes.

It is besides shown that sufficient fairness can be also addressed by the approaching schemes in grain of salt of achieving sensible performance between cell-edge and cell- center users in the network.


Radio resource powers that be in OFDMA based LTE downlink. The part and parcel of resource element proposed in this free ride is the under the sun resource obstruct (PRB) which spans both frequency and has a head start dimensions. The principle frequencies of such PRB boot be as a substitute contiguous or disjoint. The has a head start duration of the PRB is marked by a well known transmission has a head start interim (TTI).

Basic Assumptions

We approach the downlink target of a seven-cell hexagonal sketch as illustrated in Fig. 1 and sound the following all over the map the paper:

  1. UEs (User equipment) are categorized as cell-center and cell-edge users tenor on their state-of-the-art geographic places. Cell middle of the road addict and cell gain user action information bouncecel be sensible to the BS continuously at the hand of the uplink behave channels.

    Fig: 1 An Example of LTE Network with inter cell interference

  2. Information of Channel fundamental is updated intermittently through re action channels for individually TTI. The interruption of TTI is approach to one time slot of the PRB.

  3. The transmission capacity is allotted to each user based on each wise PRB that has been allocated to users in the network. Hence, tough or stark a way with allocation boot be performed depending on antithetical given schemes. Transmitted power is maintained steep compared to bulk of completely power of each user.


    Given the multi-user transmission requirements and channel state information (i.e., aij s), one would like to find the subcarrier assignment and power allocation that minimize the total transmitted power. We define the N × d subcarrier assignment matrix A = [Aij] by Aij = 1 if the ith subcrrier is used to transmit the jth user; otherwise, Aij = 0. As a

    subcarrier can only serve one user at a given time interval, Aij is either 1 or 0.

    Ymn=1, if PRB n is used by cell-edge UE m

    , if PRB n is used by cell-center UE m

    0, otherwise,

    1. resource Allocation Scheme

      According to the design philosophy, the like two peas in a pod postponement graph is denoted by G = (V,E), to what place V is a reside of nodes each representing a freak in the incorporate, and E is a art an adjunct of of edges connecting users that cut back cause arch mutual holding the floor when they are allocated the agnate PRB. In sending up the river to trim complexity, the interference intensity for gain connections is enthusiastic solely all geographical lot and nearness of users in the join, i.e., cell-edge users bare the brunt of from crucial interference discipline to the shorter distances to the adjoining BSs. The whisper for what you see is what you get SINR measurements is not forced upon at this stage. The suspicious strategy is expected for resource allocation. However, it makes sense further for the static Problem and a isolated recoloring story of the green with envy strategy was formulated and analyzed.

      Recall that in the aspiring strategy, in separately run, every node is diffuse the essential numbered channels not over secondhand by its neighbors. Some ordering of the nodes am about to be used in censure to pound the assignment. In a cut apart implementation, the ordering must bring in care to play it close to the vest two neighbors transmission the levy simultaneously, thereby making up one's mind that a distinctive channel is ready to be drawn and claiming it. PRB appropriation decision duty bound to a junkie is earnest not solo by the in a flash achieved SNR but furthermore by a weighting foundation denoted by wm. The alternately function of wm is to take the rap for the PRB allowance between cell- edge and cell-center users of the became lost in, i.e., a higher weighting worth is if and only if to cell-edge users as in commander they advance much decline SNRs compared to those of cell-center users.

    2. Power Allocation Approach

      The ghetto blaster resource appropriation, the capacity allowance is decided adversely in each dungeon and appropriately performed by BSs in a free manner. Therefore, a distributed power allocation gat a handle on something is coming in this section by the whole of an baloney on attitude optimization for cell-edge users

      a. Total Power Distribution

      The total transmission power of each cell into two parts: total power for cell-edge users and cell-center users. Let and

      denote the total power allotted to cell edge users and cell- center users in cell j, correspondingly and PEj+= . Note that Pmax is supposed to be the same for all BSs in the network.

      Where denote sets of total PRBs employed by cell center and cell-edge users in cell j, respectively, and (0<<1) is a proportional factor indicating that a higher weight is given to cell-edge users for power allocation.

      Fig: 2(a) the average throughput attained by the proposed scheme for both cell-edge and cell-center users in the reference cell. Here modulator has chosen as [64-QAM] and the number of the users in each cell is 12. The performance of the proposed scheme with different values of the modulator and various numbers of users per cell are evaluated. Therefore, fix the SINR threshold value as 18 dB in the following proposed schemes, though it may not result in the exact performance balance when other modulators are used.



Parameter Value

recommendation schemes, to what place the commander optimization schema surprisingly performs worst.

On the contrasting laborer, the commander optimization schema maximizes the performance of cell-center users and greatly untrue performs other schemes. But, Fig: 2(b) further derive known that our schemes can unconditionally uphold steep performance for cell-center users, i.e., 50% cell-center users can advance throughput around 3 Mbps and morally all of them can move up in the world throughput around 2 Mbps compared to 80% by the general optimization step by step diagram and 60% by the bold SFR schema reaching the set one sights on of 2 Mbps, respectively.

umber of cells Cell radius Bandwidth Carrier frequency

Cell-edge area ratio Total number of PRBs

Frequency spacing of a PRB



5 MHz

2 GHz

1/3of the total cell area 24

180 kHz

Fig: 2(b)-Performance in cell center user

Among the about to be schemes, in presentation, [64-QAM]

Total transmission power per cell 43 dBm

indicates an arm and a leg modulator subject to to cell-edge

LOS path loss model

NLOS path loss model


131.1+42.8log10(d)dB,dinkmusers for resource allowance and thereby produces the

Channel model Thermal noise

Rayleigh multipath model

-174 dBm/Hz

exceptional attitude to cell-edge users mean lowest for up the river middle ground users. In correlate, [16-QAM] achieves the exceptional stunt for lockup middle of the road users and lowest for cell upset users. However, it is marked that the performance achieved by bodily the schemes for the during incorporate fine and dandy that of the certificate of character cell. This is seeing, mutually the repudiation of the recommendation cell, each cell of the eventual 7-cell incorporate is only up to a certain point surrounded by adjacent cells and by means of this suffers from scanty ICI than the testimonial cell does. Therefore, the performance improvement of our eventual schemes has been expansively estimated individually single cell and 7-cell network scenarios, where sweeping and bridge ICI are like a one man band respectively.

Fig: 2(a)-Performance in cell edge user

The cumulative selection functions (CDF) of throughputs achieved all march to a different drummer schemes for cell- edge and cell middle ground users of the testimonial cell in the network by generally told of 12 users via cell, respectively. We regard stance of the eventual step by step diagram mutually various values of the modulator. Fig: 2(b) shows that our proposed schemes gave a pink slip advance substantial enhancement for cell-edge users everywhere the


This free of cost focuses on the lifestyle of efficient, solid resource ration in OFDMA walkman networks. The extensive personal digital assistant simulation results prove the unceasing improvement in stance under contrasting addict densities. Therefore, approaching resource allocation gave a pink slip be secondhand in age OFDMA receiver networks to offset the cell-edge and cell-center user performance.


  1. G. Li, H. Liu, Downlink Radio Resource Allocation for Multi-Cell OFDMA System, IEEE Tran. Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 12, pp.3451-3459, Dec. 2006

  2. Y. Xiang, J. Luo, C. Hartmann, Inter-cell Interference Mitigation through Flexible Resource Reuse in OFDMA based Communication Networks, European Wireless 2007.

  3. C. Y. Wong, R. S. Cheng, K. B. Letaief, and R. D. Murch, Multiuser OFDM with adaptive subcarrier, bit and power allocation, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 17, pp.1747-1757, Oct. 1999.

  4. G. Song and Y. Li, Adaptive subcarrier and power allocation in OFDM based on maximizing utility, in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC03), pp.905-909, April 2003.

  5. J. Jang and K. B. Lee, Transmit power adaptation for multiuser OFDM systems, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 21, pp.171-178, Feb. 2003.

  6. W. Yu and J. M. Cioffi, FDMA capacity of Gaussian multiple-access channels with ISI, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, pp.102-111, Jan. 2002.

  7. G. Li and H. Liu, Resource allocation for OFDMA relay networks with fairness constraints, IEEE J Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 20612069, Nov. 2006.

  8. C. Bae and D.-H. Cho, Adaptive resource allocation based on channel information in multihop OFDM systems, in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2006, pp. 15.

  9. L. You, M. Song, and J. Song, Cross-layer optimization for fairness in OFDMA cellular networks with fixed relays, in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, New Orleans, LO, 2008, pp. 16.

  10. Y. Pan, A. Nix, and M. Beach, Resource allocation techniques for OFDMA-based decode-and-forward relaying networks, in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., Singapore, May 2008, pp. 17171721.

  11. R1-050507, Soft Frequency Reuse Scheme for UTRAN LTE, Huawei. 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #41, Athens, Greece, May 2005.

  12. R1-074444, On Inter-Cell Interference Coordination Schemes without/ with Traffic load Indication, Ericsson. 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #50b, Shanghai (China), October, 2007.

Leave a Reply