Delay Evaluation as the Impact of Side Friction on Heterogeneous Traffic Towards Road Performance with Vissim Microsimulation

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS020442

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Delay Evaluation as the Impact of Side Friction on Heterogeneous Traffic Towards Road Performance with Vissim Microsimulation

Iin Irawati

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Semarang University

Jln. Arteri Sukarno Hatta- Semarang

Abstract- Indonesia is one of the developing country with heterogeneous characteristics of traffic flow. One of them is side activities causing side friction. Side friction itself has impact on the road performace. This reasearch focuses on delay evaluation which is one of the road performance parameter, using microscopic approach that takes place on one of traditional market in Central Java, that is in Mranggen market. Data analysis is drawn using VISSIM. From simulation results and Lilliefors method test to figure out the significance, we can conlude that there is significant difference between the delay of road segment with side friction, that is 128.838 time per vehicle ( s ) , than the delay of road segment without side friction, that is 96.310 time per vehicle ( s ).

Keywords: side friction, road performance, delay, microsimulation, VISSIM

INTRODUCTION

Most Asian countries has heterogeneous traffic and Indonesia as one of the developing country has the characteristic. The characteristics of heterogeneous traffic are many kinds of vehicles in every road side, dynamic characteristic of vehicle composition, and complex behaviour of undiscipline road users ( Tiwari et al, 2007; Venkatesan et al, 2008; Praveen dan Arasan, 2013; Fazalmohammed dan Dave, 2014 ). Activity road side factor affecting side friction is one of the traffic characteristic in urban area in Indonesia aside from mix traffic, public transportation condition and undiscipline driving behaviour.

Side friction has great impacts on capacity and road performance (Rizani, 2013). The great number of side friction caused in a road side causes traffic jam. IHCM, 1997; side frictions are defines as all those actions related to the activities taking place by the sides of the road and sometimes within the road, which interfere with the traffic flow on the travelled way. The side friction impacts on diminution of road width and speed flow of vehicle and delay addition.

Land use in an area gives impact on the existing transportation system. Transportation system and land development are interrelated. One of the area that has high side friction is market, mainly traditional market. Traditional market has unique characteristics of traffic, one of them is the existing various side friction. Market is one of the bond that unites the flow of goods and services and the users.

This review study focuses on Mranggen Market in Mranggen which is suburban area near the capital city of Central Java, Semarang. Mranggen Market is a strategic market which lies on province highway that links Semarang Purwodadi Blora.

The disorganized traffic condition of Mranggen affecting Mranggen market traffic jam caused by:

  1. Great number of trip generation and trip distribution in the area which is the center of transaction between seller and buyer that is not provided by adequate infrastructures.

  2. Road narrowing as the impact of side activities of society which causes high number of side friction, for instance

    • Illegal parking in the road side in front of the market because of the lack of parking area.

    • Street vendors in the road side and the sidewalk

    • Pedestrians in the road side because of the lack of sidewalk and pavement conversion for trading activities.

    • Non – motorized vehicle deceleration in the road side.

    • Bad habit of public transportation which picking up and setting down passengers in the side of the road because of the lack number of public transport stops.

  3. Public transportation delay because of the crossing pedestrian and the inexistence of pedestrian bridge.

  4. Traffic jam because of the flood in the rain season and the bad drainase system.

  5. Useless signal intersection near the market

  6. Bad median strip. Many non-permanent median strip which makes motorcycles carelessly turning around in the gap.

  7. High number of commuterisation which is not provided with good infrastructure. h)

Figure of Traffic Condition

Figure 1. Traffic Condition

By looking at the background, we need to evaluate the performance of the road for better traffic management by using different approach from IHCM 1997, that is microscopic approach. Microscopic approach methode differs from approach methode used in the arrangement of IHCM 1997 that is macroscopic approach towards traffic flow using Greenberg model with the empirical data input in the form of speed and flow ( Munawar et al, 2014 ). Microscopic approach is choosen because of its ability to read characteristic every vehicles movement ( Ni, 2011; Arasan dan Vedagiri, 2006; Headrick and Uddin, 2014). In IHCM 1997, parameter for road performance is degree of saturation (DS) which is the comparation between flow ( Q ) and capacity ( C ), while this study review using delay parameter.

METHODOLOGY

Field execution planning or primer

Research instrument, time and location of research, needed data, number of surveyor, speed of

Review to the literature

Figure Flowchart of Methodology

Problem identification

Survey execution

Collecting and extraction data

Primer data : amount of vehicles, composition of vehicles, road geometric, side frictions

Data analysis with microsimulation

Data input with VISSIM software

Compare

Traffic simulation results without side frictions

Traffic simulation results with side frictions

Conclusion

Figure 2. Flowchart of Methodology

DATA COLLECTION

Road Geometric Data

Field observation results shows that road type in front of pasar Mranggen are 2 sides, 2 strips, 2 direction divided ( 2/2D ). Picture and details geometric data is presented as in the following table 1.

Table 1. Road Geomatric Data

Parameter

Observasion Results

Strip Width

Sides

A

B

4,5 m

3,5 m

Road Segment Length

220 m

Non Permanent Median Length

300 m

Median Width

0,7 m

( Source : field measurement result )

Vehicle Volume Data

Based on the 3 days observation by taking morning rush hour, day and afternoon, there time with highest vehicle volume, that is in the Sunday morning. Volume data vehicle per 15 minutes presented as in the table 2 and figure 2.

Table 2. Vehicle Volume Data

td bgcolor=”#D9D9D9″>

Total (vehicle)/15 minutes

Road Segment

Time

Number of Every Vehicle Types

MC

LV

HV

UM

08.00 – 08.15

738

150

48

12

948

Highway

08.15 – 08.30

795

184

49

15

1043

08.30 – 08.45

722

139

20

13

894

Mranggen (front

08.45 – 09.00

715

165

30

11

921

of pasar

09.00 – 09.15

600

173

30

9

812

Mranggen)

09.15 – 09.30

614

190

30

17

851

09.30 – 09.45

644

163

43

17

867

09.45 – 10.00

558

145

50

15

768

( Source: field measurement result )

MC = motorcycle

LV = light vehicle

HV = heavy vehicle

UM = unmotorcycle

Figure of Vehicle Compotition

MC = 78 % LV = 16 % HV = 5 %

UMC = 1 %

Figure 3. Vehicle Composition

Figure of Vehicle Number Fluctuation Graphic per 15 Minutes

vehicles

15 minutes

s

Side Friction Data

Figure 4. Vehicle Fluctuation per 15 Minutes ( Source : field measurement result )

Side friction on the road segment above is presented on the table 3.

Table 3. Side Friction Data

Road Segment

Side Friction Types

Vehicle out / in / to road side

Slowing down vehicle

Stopping vehicle on the road side

Pedestrian

Front of pasar Mranggen

431

22

219

309

( Source: field measurement result )

VISSIM SIMULATION

Traffic simulation is applied trough some steps or VISSIM algorithm as followed:

  1. Making background images based on the location map taken from googlemap.

  2. Making traffic setting with valid system in Indonesia on the Network Setting choices, by choosing left side traffic.

  3. Making link or strip according to the amount, width, and direction of the vehicles.

  4. Inputting the vehicle types on the vehicle input based on the category: motorcycle ( matic / scooter and non matic ), light vehicle, bus, truck, bycicle, and pedicab.

  5. Inputting vehicle composition according to the amount of every vehicle types and speed rate of every vehicle types.

  6. Making conflict area on the road performance based on the side friction, as the impact of illegal parking, streets vendors, picking up and setting down passengers in the side of the road, slowing down vehicle ( bycicle and pedicab ), and walking pedestrian on the side of the road. The movement of the pedestrian which is crossing, made in the second conflict area. The crossing movement impacts on the delay accretion on the passing vehicle.

  7. Inputting driving behaviour by choosing urban ( motorist ).

  8. Element component driving behaviour on Car Following Wideman 74 chossen is the average standstill distance, by taking 0.5 meters, resulted from field observation.

RESULTS

Delay with Side Friction

Delay scores presented on the table 4, is obtained from simulation results. Delay was taken per 150 seconds to figure out the frequency distribution.

Figure of VISSIM Microsimulation with Side Friction

Figure 5. VISSIM Microsimulation with Side Friction

Table 4. Simulation Results ( Frequency Distribution of Delay ) with Side Friction

Delay

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

24,780

1

4,2

4,2

4,2

51,830

1

4,2

4,2

8,3

83,840

1

4,2

4,2

12,5

99,970

1

4,2

4,2

16,7

111,330

1

4,2

4,2

20,8

122,330

1

4,2

4,2

25,0

132,110

1

4,2

4,2

29,2

134,400

1

4,2

4,2

33,3

139,500

1

4,2

4,2

37,5

140,950

1

4,2

4,2

41,7

143,190

1

4,2

4,2

45,8

143,410

1

4,2

4,2

50,0

143,420

1

4,2

4,2

54,2

143,550

2

8,3

8,3

62,5

143,740

1

4,2

4,2

66,7

145,920

1

4,2

4,2

70,8

146,430

1

4,2

4,2

75,0

146,470

1

4,2

4,2

79,2

146,600

1

4,2

4,2

83,3

146,650

1

4,2

4,2

87,5

148,650

1

4,2

4,2

91,7

152,320

2

8,3

8,3

100,0

Total

24

100,0

100,0

Figure of Frequency Distribution of Delay with Side Fricton

Delay time per vehicle ( s )

Figure 6. Frequency of Distribution ( with Side Friction )

The graphic shows that the data is not normally distributed with the points spread tends to run to right meaning that value of delay on average is 128.838 time per vehicle ( s ).

Delay without Side Friction

The results of delay shows on figure

Figure of VISSIM Microsimulation without Side Friction

Figure 7. VISSIM Microsimulation without Side Friction

Table 5. Simulation Results ( Frequency Distribution of Delay ) without Side Friction

Delay

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

37,820

1

4,2

4,2

4,2

52,740

2

8,3

8,3

12,5

62,720

1

4,2

4,2

16,7

66,720

1

4,2

4,2

20,8

76,151

1

4,2

4,2

25,0

82,280

1

4,2

4,2

29,2

93,700

1

4,2

4,2

33,3

96,360

1

4,2

4,2

37,5

96,450

1

4,2

4,2

41,7

96,600

1

4,2

4,2

45,8

97,720

1

4,2

4,2

50,0

100,220

1

4,2

4,2

54,2

102,770

1

4,2

4,2

58,3

105,480

1

4,2

4,2

62,5

106,130

1

4,2

4,2

66,7

111,870

1

4,2

4,2

70,8

116,130

1

4,2

4,2

75,0

121,200

1

4,2

4,2

79,2

124,270

1

4,2

4,2

83,3

124,400

1

4,2

4,2

87,5

127,310

1

4,2

4,2

91,7

128,900

1

4,2

4,2

95,8

130,770

1

4,2

4,2

100,0

Total

24

100,0

100,0

Figure of Frequency Distribution of Delay without Side Friction

Delay time per vehicle ( s )

Figure 8. Frequency of Distribution ( without Side Friction )

The graphics shows that the data is normally distributed equally spread up and down across the graph and the score on average is 96.310 time per vehicle. The score is lower than the road with side friction.

Statistical Test Significance Level

The results of test significance with Lilliefors test method in SPSS program are shown in table 6.

Table 6. Results of test significance

Test Value = 0

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

With side friction

19,272

23

,000

128,635833

114,82815

142,44352

Without side

friction

17,829

23

,000

96,310458

85,13594

107,48497

If the value of sig > 0.05 then the data give normal distribution. From Table 3 indicated that the sig = 0.00 < 0.005. It means the data is not normal and there is a significant difference between the road segments with side side friction and without side friction.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude that in data with VISSIM microsimulation, side friction gives great impact on the road. According to the road segments in front of the Mranggen Market as a case study, value of the delay is 128.838 time per vehicle ( s ). If the road segments without side friction, then the delay value is 96.310 time per vehicle ( s ).

REFERENCES

Arasan, T.,V. and Vedagri, P., ( 2006 ), Estimation of Saturation Flow of Heterogenous Traffic Using Computer Simulation, Proceeding 20th European Conference Modelling and Simulation, 2006.

Fazalmohammed, S., M. and Dave, K., H., ( 2014 ), Effect of Heterogenous Traffic on Saturation Flow, International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research, 2104.

Headrick, J. and Uddin, W., ( 2014 ), Traffic Flow Microsimulation For Performance Evaluation of Roundabouts and Stop Controlled Intersection at Highway Overpass, Advances in Transportation, Studies International Journal Section 434, 2014.

Munawar, A., Pribadi, S., O. and Malkhamah, S., ( 2014 ), Analisis Kapasitas Jalan dengan Metode Traffic Microsimulation, The 17th FSTPT International Symposium, Jember University, 2014.

Ni, D., ( 2011), Multiscale Modelling of Traffic Flow, Mathematica Aeterna, Vol.1, 2011.

Praveen, S., P. and Arasan, T.,V., ( 2013 ), Influence of Traffic Mix on PCU Value of Vehicles Under Heterogeneous Traffic Condition, International Journal of Traffic Engineering, 2013.

Rizani, A., ( 2013 ), Evaluasi Kinerja Jalan Akibat Hambatan Samping ( Studi Kasus Pada Jalan Soetoyo S Banjarmasin ), Jurnal Sains dan Terapan Politeknik Hasnur, Volume 1 Nomor 1 April 2013.

Tiwari, G., Fazio, J. and Gaurav, S., ( 2007 ), Traffic Planning For Homogenous Traffic, Sadhana Vol.38, Part.4, August 2007, pp.309-329, Printed in India.

Venkatesan, K., Gowri, and Sivanandan, Development of Microscopic Simulation Models For Heterogeneous Traffic Using Object Oriented Approach, Transportmedica, 2008.

Leave a Reply