Conceptual Structure Design Through Thickness Optimization Of High Pressure And High Temperature Self Regulated Pressure Valve Using Non- Linear Transient Finite Element Method

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS60886

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Conceptual Structure Design Through Thickness Optimization Of High Pressure And High Temperature Self Regulated Pressure Valve Using Non- Linear Transient Finite Element Method

Sushant M. Patil *, Ramchandra G. Desavale **, Imran M. Jamadar ***

* P.G Student (Design), Department of Mechanical Engineering, A.D.C.E.T., Ashta

** Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, A.D.C.E.T., Ashta

*** Assistant Professor, Department of Automobile Engineering, A.D.C.E.T., Ashta

Abstract

The primary purpose of a flow control valve is protection of life and property by venting fluid from an over pressurized vessel. Proper sizing, selection, manufacture, assembly, test, installation and maintenance of a flow control valve are all critical to obtaining maximum protection. A flow control valve is a safety device designed to protect a pressurized vessel or system during an overpressure event. An overpressure event refers to any condition which would cause pressure in a vessel or system to increase beyond the specified design pressure or maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP). Since flow control valves are safety devices, there are many Codes and Standards written to control their design and application. Many electronic, pneumatic and hydraulic systems exist today to control fluid system variables, such as pressure, temperature and flow. Each of these systems requires a power source of some type, such as electricity or compressed air in order to operate. A flow control valve must be capable of operating at all times, especially during a period of power failure when system controls are nonfunctional. The sole source of power for the flow control valve, therefore, is the process fluid. Once a condition occurs that causes the pressure in a system or vessel to increase to a dangerous level, the flow control valve may be the only device remaining to prevent a catastrophic failure. Since reliability is directly related to the complexity of the device, it is important that the design of the flow control valve be as simple as possible. In most of the studies, the gradually flow reducer valve has been focused mainly for high pressure and temperature application such as fertilizer industries, process industries, boilers etc. and utilization of these valves for given

applications. However, a very few studies have been carried out and reported in literature, which address the effect of severity of high pressure and high temperature on the failure of this valve and components. This valve is having great advantages over all remaining valve types. It is possible to design a self regulated valve named gradually flow reducer valve.

In this paper the optimization of thickness of valve plate, material selection, design of various components of valve and analysis of gradual flow reducing valves for both axial and bending has been discussed.

Keywords Design of components, Gradual flow reducer valve, Thickness optimization.

  1. Introduction

    AOMI has developed effective valves to control flow in pressure operations as the one illustrated in the fig.1.

    Fig.1 Flow control valve operation

    However currently the valves are design for smaller applications. Its usage for large scale applications is being explored. With the development of self-regulated bi- metallic valve [1] the next focus has been to develop a pressure valve which is equally robust. The main idea remains same, safety of the system, and prevention of vessel bursting due to pressure overload. Traditional safety valves work on the outlet side, wherein if a particular pressure is reached the valves burst open resulting in a pressure relief and prevention of bursting. However if the gas is toxic, release should be the last option. The idea is then to regulate inflow into the vessel, once a critical pressure is reached. This valve will be an additional fail safe, in case the electronics fail.

  2. Problem statement

    Gradual flow reducer valve has been selected for design approach. In gradual flow reducer valve, the obstructer will have a combined load of bending due to the flow, plus the load of the springs and pressure. This will be a transient phenomenon and will need careful FEA for determining life of the valve determining life of the valve. Valve is used for such high pressure and high temperature applications.

    Fig. 2 Vital Aspect of Design

    In this valve, a spring loaded obstruction will be used (Fig. 2). It will be so calibrated that it will connected to that it will connected to the vessel where pressure is to be regulated. The pressure P, inside the vessel will push the obstruction against the spring load.

  3. Valve design

    Outlier objective is to finalize dimensionality for pressure vessel valve, multiple objectives include, material finalization, thickness requirement, and stiffness finalization, Demonstration of feasibility of feedback loop (Pipe) and execution of loop (Pipe), and the characteristics of the loop.

    Input data

    The available data on field is provided by the client. Depending upon these data design of valve has to be made. Inlet loop has been finalized as per the detail dimensions given in following table no.1 and Feedback loop has been finalized as per the detail dimensions given in following table no.2.

    Table 1 Design Inputs of Inlet Loop (Pipe)

    Sr.

    No.

    Description

    Value

    Unit

    1

    Inlet Radius

    20 mm

    mm

    2

    Inlet Pressure

    Max 0.32

    MPa

    3

    Inlet error

    N.A

    4

    Inlet sensitivity

    ± 0.01

    MPa

    5

    Operational Temperatures

    70 – 350

    °C

    Table 2 Design Inputs of Feedback Loop (Pipe)

    Sr.

    No.

    Description

    Value

    Unit

    1

    Feedback inlet Radius

    15

    mm

    2

    Feedback Pressure

    Max 0.32

    MPa

    3

    Feedback error

    less than 3%

    4

    Feedback Sensitivity

    ± 0.01

    MPa

    5

    Operational Temperatures

    70 – 350

    °C

    Valve Components and their design

    For fitting the valve for the pressure vessel in the inlet pipe, different components of the valve are designed for dimension. The names of the component are as follows.

    1. Valve plate

    2. Spring

    3. Valve casing

    4. Inlet and feedback pipe

    5. Flanges

      The valve plate and spring dimensions for the accurate fitting of valve with given input data as shown in fig. 3.

      Fig. 3 Vital Aspect of Design

      The inlet pipe and feedback design are provided by the client. The radius of inlet pipe is 20 mm and the feedback pipe radius is 15 mm. the details of the pipe and flanges are as shown in fig. 5.

      Fig. 4 Vital Aspect of Design

      Casing is designed in such way that there is a full closing of valve along with the required opening and closing operations of the valve without any leakage. Casing is shown in full model of valve fig 4.

      Fig. 5 Assembled full model of gradual flow reducer valve

      Sr.

      No.

      Component name

      Quantity

      Final Dimensions

      1

      Valve plate

      Vertical valve plate

      01

      45 mm X 52 mm

      X 2 mm

      Horizontal valve plate

      01

      35 mm X 45 mm

      X 2 mm

      2

      Pipe

      Inlet pipe

      02

      R=20 mm, L=50

      mm, t=3mm

      Feedback pipe

      01

      R=15 mm, L=50

      mm, t=3mm

      3

      Valve casing

      01

      As per valve plate

      4

      Springs

      04

      =5 mm, L=55

      mm

      5

      Flanges

      02

      81 mm X 91 mm

      X 3 mm

      Sr.

      No.

      Component name

      Quantity

      Final Dimensions

      1

      Valve plate

      Vertical valve plate

      01

      45 mm X 52 mm

      X 2 mm

      Horizontal valve plate

      01

      35 mm X 45 mm

      X 2 mm

      2

      Pipe

      Inlet pipe

      02

      R=20 mm, L=50

      mm, t=3mm

      Feedback pipe

      01

      R=15 mm, L=50

      mm, t=3mm

      3

      Valve casing

      01

      As per valve plate

      4

      Springs

      04

      =5 mm, L=55

      mm

      5

      Flanges

      02

      81 mm X 91 mm

      X 3 mm

      Table 3 Dimensions of valve components

      After designing all the components, the gradual flow reducer valve gets assembled. The assembly of the gradual flow reducer valve is shown in fig 5.

      Construction of gradual flow reducer valve

      Valve plate is placed at the centre as shown in fig 5. The casing is made around the valve plate so as to there is no any leakage of valve during operation and also it allows the up and down motion of the valve plate along with compression and expansion of the springs. Inlet pipes are connected at the top to the casing. Feedback pipe is connected to the lower flange. Upper flange is connected to the casing. The two flanges are connected with each other with help of nuts and bolts in provided holes.

      Working of gradual flow reducer valve

      Initially the fluid with a pressure about 0.32 MPa is coming from the inlet loop (pipe) and straightly going into the pressure vessel or tank. As the pressure vessel is filling with the fluid with the same pressure as like inlet loop (0.32MPa) is start to push the valve plate in upward direction against the four springs, the fluid is pushing the plate in upward direction there is axial load on the valve plate. Since valve plate is coming up the bending load due to fluid pressure in inlet loop acting on a plate.

      Table 4 List Materials used

      Sr.

      No.

      Component name

      Material used

      1

      Valve plate

      Titanium

      2

      Pipe

      Structural steel

      3

      Valve casing

      Structural steel

      4

      Springs

      Structural steel

      5

      Flanges

      Structural steel

      Material properties

      Usually material in flow control valve is titanium. Titanium is used in process equipment (heat exchangers, tanks, process vessels, valves) also titanium used in the chemical and petrochemical industries primarily for corrosion resistance.

      Titanium metal is used in automotive applications, particularly in automobile or motorcycle racing, where weight reduction is critical while maintaining high strength and rigidity. The metal is generally too expensive to make it marketable to the general consumer market, other than high-end products, particularly for the racing/performance market. Late model Corvettes have been available with titanium exhausts. Titanium is used in many sporting goods, tennis rackets, golf clubs, lacrosse stick shafts, cricket, hockey, lacrosse, and football helmet grills and bicycle frames and components. Although not a mainstream material for bicycle production, titanium bikes have been used by race teams and adventure cyclists. Titanium alloys are also used in spectacle frames. This results in a rather expensive, but highly durable and long lasting frame which is light in weight and causes no skin allergies. Many backpackers use titanium equipment, including cookware, eating utensils, lanterns, and tent stakes. Though slightly more expensive than traditional steel or aluminum alternatives, these titanium products can be significantly lighter without compromising strength. Because of its superior strength and light weight when compared to other metals traditionally used in flow control valves (steel, stainless steel, and aluminum), and advances in metalworking techniques, the use of titanium has become more widespread in the manufacture of flow control valves. For the valve casing, pipes and flanges structural steel is used.

      Table 5 Materials Properties

      Material

      Dens ity (Kg/ m3)

      Tensile yield strengt h (MPa)

      Compres sive yield strength (MPa)

      Tensile ultimate strength (MPa)

      Structural steel

      7850

      250

      250

      460

      Titanium

      4620

      9330

      930

      10700

      Nominal Composition of titanium alloy used

      The nominal composition of the titanium alloy which is used for the valve plate is given in following table 6.

      Table 6 Dimensions of valve components

      C

      Fe

      H

      N

      O

      Al

      Nb

      Ta

      Ti

      0.08

      0.5

      0.15

      0.05

      0.4

      6.0

      7.0

      0.5

      Rem

  4. Analysis approach

    The complex dynamic plate, jacket and pipe stresses created during fluid flow under 0.32 MPa

    pressure are not well understood, even though the fluid flow under 0.32 MPa pressure transients causing the stresses may be approximated using various techniques, as discussed by Wiley and Streeter [23]. The dynamic stresses are investigated herein using finite element techniques.

    The designed valve is analyzed by using ANSYS 12 Tool. While doing analysis firstly the thickness of the valve plate is finalized by varying the thickness in each analysis. After these analyses the optimum thickness gets finalized. The details of these analyses are as follows.

    Model Geometry

    Model of the selected valve was done using ANSYS Workbench V12 the details of which are as,

    Fig. 6 plate geometry

    FEA Element selection and meshing

    For this non linear transient stress analysis, the body elements used in Workbench is SOLID186, a three dimensional (3D) 20-node hexahedral structural element. This type of elements promise a well-haped mesh on even the most complicated geometries.

    Fig. 7 Element and Meshing

    Boundary Conditions

    For all the analyses valve spring seat and contact area with casing is kept fixed, which is the first boundary condition for all analyses. Second boundary

    condition it that to apply the load in X-direction on vertical plate of 0.32 MPa. The mesh size is kept default for all configurations. Here six different thicknesses configurations of the valve plate have analyzed and stress and deformation of these six different thickness configurations are compared. Depending upon the values of stress and strain the optimum thickness gets finalized.

    2mm thickness we are getting considerable stress and deformation also we are achieving optimum weight and volume. Out of these six analysis the here results of only one case (0.5 mm plate thickness) has been shown below fig 8.

    Fig. 9 Stress and deformation for 0.5 mm thick plate

    Fig. 8 Boundary conditions

    Finite Analysis Results

    Six different thicknesses configurations of the valve plate have analyzed and stress and deformation of these six different thickness configurations are tabulated in following table 7.

    Table 6 Finite Analysis Results for thickness optimization

    Analy sis type & thickn ess of plate

    Volu me (m3) 10^-6

    Mass (Kg) 10^-2

    Nod es

    Eleme nts

    Total deforma tion (mm)

    Eq. Stres s (MP

    a)

    0.5

    mm

    1.93

    79

    0.794

    52

    337

    20

    6560

    0.9130

    8

    240.

    08

    1

    mm

    5.81

    36

    2.383

    6

    482

    53

    9977

    0.0952

    37

    29.8

    58

    1.5

    mm

    5.81

    36

    2.383

    6

    482

    53

    9977

    0.0952

    37

    111.

    1

    2

    mm

    7.75

    15

    3.178

    1

    491

    65

    1035

    8

    0.0436

    66.4

    33

    2.5

    9.68

    7.606

    525

    1125

    0.0248

    15.4

    mm

    93

    1

    97

    3

    5

    37

    3

    11.6

    14.76

    646

    1404

    0.0161

    13.0

    mm

    27

    71

    98

    6

    32

    48

    From above result table it is finalized that thickness of valve has to be kept 2mm, because at

    Full model analysis

    After optimizing the valve thickness the further analysis has been done for the full geometry of the valve. The full model of the valve with all the components has taken from fig. 5.

    Following table 7 is the results table for different analysis done in ANSYS 12.

    Fig. 10 Boundary Conditions for full model

    Fig. 11 Boundary Conditions for full model

    Table 6 Finite Analysis Results for full model

    Analysis type

    Equivalen t stress (..x 107Pa)

    Total Deformatio n (m)

    Nodes

    Mass (Kg)

    Plate in bending

    0.66433

    4.36 x 10-5

    49165

    3.1781

    x 10-2

    Plate in axial loads

    3.8726

    0.04172

    14976

    3.1781

    x 10-2

    Combine d bending & axial load

    4.7947

    0.039444

    14937

    3.1781

    x 10-2

    Jacket stresses

    2.6989

    1.2851×10

    -4

    10427

    6

    0.1588

    5

    Valve with pipe

    5.0514

    0.042066

    15407

    5

    0.8051

    3

    Non linear Transient Analysis

    6.25

    0.042096

    15609

    5

    0.8051

    3

    Fig. 12 Stress and Deformation in plate for Non linear Transient Analysis

  5. Conclusion

A fresh self regulated pressure valve fully mechanically operated on/off valve designed for control of hydraulic ow has been offered. The design of this gradual floe reducer valve has been designed with available data on field. The thickness optimization of this gradual flow reducer valve has been done by using finite element analysis. The optimum thickness of the valve is finalized as 2mm. After finalizing the optimum design, same design has been taken for the further analysis. All further analysis has done for analyzing stress levels and maximum deformation. A prototype valve based on the proposed design has simultaneously achieved

high ow, low full open pressure drop (0.32 MPa), and no extra actuation power system. A basic model of the valve suitable for design purposes and optimization has been developed. Proper design can improve efficiency. Future work will focus on certify the design with experimental results.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. I. M

.Jamadar for helpful discussions related to the modeling in this work, and Mr. V. G. Patil of Vaftsy Engineering services Ltd. Pune for providing necessary guideline in carrying out Finite Element Analysis.

REFERENCES

  1. Matin Kagadi, Prof. Girish Tembhare, Vinaay Patil, Sujay Shelke, 2012, Optimization of Self Activating Bi-Metallic Valve using Thermo Structural Coupled FEA.

  2. Crosby® Pressure Relief Valve Engineering Handbook, 1997.

  3. M. R. Mokhtanadeh-Dehghan, N. Ladommatos, and

    T. J. Brennan, 1997, Finite element analysis of flow in a hydraulic pressure valve, Elsevier Science Inc.

  4. Mahoney, Joseph M., A Bimetallic Valve Solution for a Hydrogen-Powered Micro-Generator.

  5. Greg Ritchie, 1989, Minimizing pressure relief valve seat leakage through optimization of design parameters June 1989, Massachusetts Institute of technology.

  6. United states patent, Duncan (1983) patent no. 4,390,159.

  7. Zhi-fei Peng, Chun-geng Sun, Rui-Bo Yuan, Peng Zhang, 2012, he CFD analysis of main valve flow field and structural optimization for double-nozzle flapper servo valve, Procedia Engineering, 31, pp. 115-121.

  8. Qin Yang, Zhiguo Zhang, Mingyue Liu, Jing Hu, 2011, Numerical Simulation of Fluid Flow inside the Valve, Procedia Engineering, 23, pp. 543-550.

  9. Hao Wu, Zheng Zhong, Noureddine Benseddiq, Abdellatif Imad, 2011, Numerical solution of crack shape for the thermo-mechanical loaded valve, Engineering Failure Analysis, 18, pp. 1487-1495.

  10. Ritika Mohan, Benjamin R. Schudel, Amit V. Desai, Joshua D. Yearsley, Christopher A. Apblett, Paul J.A. Kenis, 2011, Design considerations for elastomeric normally closed microfluidic valves, Sensors and Actuators, B 160, pp. 1216 1223.

  11. Gabor Licsko, Alan Champneys, Csaba Hos, Nonlinear Analysis of a Single Stage Pressure Relief Valve, IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 39:4, IJAM_39_4_12, 12

    November 2009.

  12. David Kazmer & Mahesh Munavalli University of Massachusetts Lowell, Design And Performance Analysis Of A Self Regulating Melt Pressure Valve.

  13. Dong-Soo KIM, Myoung-Sub KIM; Analysis and Design Of Cryogenic Ball Valve, Proceedings of the 7th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, TOYAMA 2008 Sptember 15-18, 2008.

  14. Farid VakiliTahami, Mohammad Zehsaz, MohammadAli Saeimi Sadigh, Numerical Modal Analysis Of Howell Bunger Valve Using FEM Method Amin Paykani; International Journal Of Applied Engineering Research, Dindigul Volume 1, No 4, 2011.

  15. Gabor Licsko Alan Champneys Csaba Hs ; Dynamic Analysis of a Hydraulic Pressure Relief Valve; Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009 Vol II WCE 2009, July 1 – 3, 2009, London, U.K.

  16. Himadri Chattopadhyay , Arindam Kundu , Binod

    K. Saha , Tapas Gangopadhyay ; Analysis of flow structure inside a spool type pressure regulating valve. Energy Conversion and Management 53 (2012) 196204.

  17. Xue guan Song and Young Chul Park; Numerical analysis of butterfly valve-prediction of flow Coefficient and hydrodynamic torque coefficient. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2007 ,WCECS 2007, October 24-26, 2007, San Francisco, USA.

  18. Jun-Oh Kim, Seol-Min Yang, Seok-Heum Baek, Sangmo Kang; Structural design strategy of double- eccentric butterfly valve using topology

optimization techniques, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 66 2012 FAMT, ME, Mechanical Engineering (Machine Design) 10

Leave a Reply