🔒
Peer-Reviewed Excellence Hub
Serving Researchers Since 2012

Clothing Color Preferences among Individuals with Narcissistic Traits

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV15IS090440
Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Clothing Color Preferences among Individuals with Narcissistic Traits

Jie Xu

College of Textiles and Clothing Engineer-ing

Soochow University Suzhou, 215021, China

Yutian Zhang

College of Textiles and Clothing Engineer-ing

Soochow University Suzhou, 215021, China

Xiaofeng Jiang

College of Textiles and Clothing Engineer-ing

Soochow University Suzhou, 215021, China

Abstract – Narcissism is characterized by excessive self-focus and heightened attention to the enhancement of ones appear- ance. This study examined clothing color preferences among in- dividuals with different levels of narcissism, using hue, value, and chroma as stimulus variables and a narcissism scale to assess narcissistic traits. Three main findings emerged. First, individu- als with high levels of narcissism preferred red and yellow cloth- ing, whereas those with moderate or low levels preferred blue clothing. Second, individuals with high levels of narcissism gen- erally preferred clothing with high color value, whereas those with moderate or low levels preferred clothing with low color value. Third, individuals with high levels of narcissism generally preferred high-chroma clothing, those with moderate levels pre- ferred moderate-chroma clothing, and those with low levels pre- ferred low-chroma clothing. These findings extend the applica- tion of research on narcissism and provide an additional perspec- tive on clothing consumption.

Keywords – Narcissistic traits; clothing color; color preference; self-presentation

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Narcissism is a personality trait characterized by an exag- gerated sense of self-importance in psychological and behav- ioral functioning. Its central features include self-centeredness, a strong desire for self-display, domineering behavior, arro- gance, and a desire for attention.

    Social and economic development has been accompanied by substantial changes in human psychology and behavior, including greater independence, aspirations for self- transcendence, and individualization. These changes have been associated with increasing levels of narcissism. The emergence and widespread use of new media have further increased the visibility of narcissistic behavior. Compared with previous generations, younger people have been de- scribed as more narcissistic, self-centered, and inclined to hold highly favorable views of themselves [1,2].

    Individuals with narcissistic traits have been described as dependent on self-esteem [3], with a strong desire for glory and a pronounced sense of vanity [4,5]. Studies have reported that they take selfies more frequently and pay greater attention to the numbers of likes and comments they receive. When this feedback falls short of their expectations, they may experience anxiety, depression, and other negative emotional responses [6,7]. Martin et al. [8] examined associations between individ- ual and collective narcissism and three types of consumption- related behavior: vanity, self-improvement, and prosocial con- sumption. Narcissism was positively associated with vanity-

    related behavior across the measures examined, and certain measures were also positively associated with specific forms of prosocial consumption.

    Individuals with narcissistic traits exhibit distinctive con- sumption patterns. They tend to purchase numerous products online to construct and maintain their image, both displaying their purchasing power and using products to satisfy their de- sire for uniqueness. Their purchases encompass a wide range of products, including luxury goods and ordinary consumer goods [9]. They are often attracted to luxury products and con- spicuous consumption, showing a willingness to buy products that are more expensive, exclusive, ostentatious, and personal- ized [10].

    People with narcissistic traits also place particular empha- sis on maintaining their self-image [11]. They have been de- scribed as having a stronger need for visual salience in self- presentation. They may use impression-management strategies and appearance-enhancement techniques to present themselves favorably, seeking positive evaluations from others to bolster their self-esteem. Such behavior includes wearing fashionable clothing and devoting considerable effort to enhancing their appearance [12]. They are more likely to wear expensive, os- tentatious clothes, maintain a well-groomed appearance, and use cosmetics. These behaviors reflect their personality char- acteristics, concern with physical attractiveness, and desire to be the center of attention [13].

    Taken together, this literature suggests that individuals with narcissistic traits place considerable importance on their appearance. Clothing color is a major visual component of the image presented by the wearer. The present study therefore investigated clothing color preferences among individuals with narcissistic traits. The findings may extend the applica- tion of research on narcissism and broaden the explanatory perspective on clothing consumption.

  2. SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION

    1. Scale Development

      A 21-item narcissism scale was developed by drawing on the NPI measure of grandiose narcissism and the HSNS meas- ure of vulnerable narcissism. Each item was rated on a five- point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Attention-check items were interspersed throughout the questionnaire to identify and exclude invalid responses.

    2. Scale Evaluation

      The scale was distributed through the Wenjuanxing online survey platform. A total of 110 questionnaires were returned, of which 92 were valid. The pretest indicated that the wording of the questionnaire items was unambiguous and readily un- derstood by respondents.

      1. Reliability Analysis: Cronbachs alpha was used to as- sess the internal consistency of the questionnaire. Items 526, excluding Item 15, comprised the 21-item narcissism scale and were used to assess respondents levels of narcissism. As shown in Table I, Cronbachs alpha was 0.921, indicating good internal consistency.

        ‌TABLE I. RELIABILITY STATISTICS.

        specified in Table III, chroma was held constant at 4 while value was varied across 3, 6, and 9 within each hue. Converse- ly, in Table IV, value was fixed at 6 while chroma was varied across 2, 6, and 10. Each series therefore included three levels of the target color attribute within the same five hue catego- ries, enabling comparisons within a hue without simultaneous- ly changing both value and chroma. Applying these color specifications to a single garment design provided a consistent visual context for preference judgments, rather than introduc- ing differences in clothing style. The removal of model fea- tures and the use of uniform image dimensions and back- grounds were intended to limit the influence of non-color cues. Together, these stimulus characteristics provided a struc- tured basis for examining preferences for specific clothing

        Cronbachs

        Number of items

        0.921

        21

        color attributes across different levels of narcissism.

        ‌TABLE III. COLOR STIMULI VARYING IN HUE AND VALUE.

      2. Validity Analysis: As shown in Table II, the Kaiser MeyerOlkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was 0.867. Bartletts test of sphericity was statisticaly significant (p < 0.05). These results were interpreted as indicating satis- factory construct validity. Taken together, the reliability and validity analyses were considered to indicate that the scale had satisfactory psychometric properties and could distinguish between different levels of narcissism.

        ‌TABLE II. KMO MEASURE AND BARTLETTS TEST OF SPHERICITY.

        Hue

        Low value

        Moderate value

        High value

        Code

        Sample

        Code

        Sample

        Code

        Sample

        7.5R

        7.5R 3/4

        7.5R 6/4

        7.5R 9/4

        7.5Y

        7.5Y 3/4

        7.5Y 6/4

        7.5Y 9/4

        7.5G

        7.5G 3/4

        7.5G 6/4

        7.5G 9/4

        7.5B

        7.5B 3/4

        7.5B 6/4

        7.5B 9/4

        7.5P

        7.5P 3/4

        7.5P 6/4

        7.5P 9/4

        Hue

        Low chroma

        Moderate chroma

        High chroma

        Code

        Sample

        Code

        Sample

        Code

        Sample

        7.5R

        7.5R 6/2

        7.5R 6/6

        7.5R 6/10

        7.5Y

        7.5Y 6/2

        7.5Y 6/6

        7.5Y 6/10

        7.5G

        7.5G 6/2

        7.5G 6/6

        7.5G 6/10

        7.5B

        7.5B 6/2

        7.5B 6/6

        7.5B 6/10

        7.5P

        7.5P 6/2

        7.5P 6/6

        7.5P 6/10

        ‌TABLE IV. COLOR STIMULI VARYING IN HUE AND CHROMA.

        KMO measure of sampling adequacy

        0.867

        Approximate 2

        1056.02

        Bartletts test

        df

        210

        p

        < 0.001

      3. Classification by Narcissism Level: Total scores ranged from 21 to 105. Scores of 75105 were classified as high nar- cissism, indicating very high levels of narcissism and pro- nounced narcissistic characteristics. Scores of 6374 were classified as moderate narcissism, indicating a moderate de- gree of narcissism and relatively apparent narcissistic charac- teristics. Scores of 62 or below were classified as low narcis- sism, indicating low or very low levels and few evident narcis- sistic characteristics.

  3. EXPERIMENT

    1. Stimulus Materials

      Colors were selected using the Munsell system. Five basic hues were used: red (R), yellow (Y), green (G), blue (B), and purple (P). Value was varied at three levels (3, 6, and 9), as shown in Table III. Chroma was also varied at three levels (2, 6, and 10), as shown in Table IV. A total of 30 colors were selected.

      The selected colors were applied to the same garment de-

    2. Procedure

      ‌Fig. 1. Examples of clothing color stimuli.

      sign, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The images were prepared at 700 × 700 pixels, with a transparent background displayed as white. All features of the model were removed to minimize the influence of extraneous stimuli. The images were processed using Photoshop CC 2019, yielding a reported total of 33 stimulus images. The questionnaire displayed one image per page in a fully randomized order. Participants rated each im- age on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 (strongly dislike) to 5 (strongly like).

      The stimulus configuration comprised two complementary series in which value and chroma were varied separately. As

      The survey was conducted using Wenjuanxing. All partic- ipants were reported to have no color blindness or color-vision deficiency. Of the 167 questionnaires returned, 155 were val- id, corresponding to a valid response rate of 92.8%. The ques- tionnaire comprised two parts. The first assessed narcissistic traits using the narcissism scale. The second assessed clothing color preferences: participants rated their preference for each clothing color on a five-point scale from 1 (strongly dislike) to 5 (strongly like).

    3. Results

      1. Participant Characteristics: The reported group sizes were 59 for low narcissism (scores of 62 or below), 46 for moderate narcissism (scores of 6374), and 47 for high narcis- sism (scores of 75105). The sample included 76 men and 79 women. The 155 valid questionnaires collected information on gender, age, occupation, and income. Descriptive statistics are presented in Table V.

        ‌TABLE V. PARTICIPANT CHARACTERISTICS (N = 155).

        Characteristic

        Category

        n

        %

        Gender

        Male

        76

        49.0

        Female

        79

        51.0

        Age (years)

        1825

        75

        48.4

        2635

        30

        19.4

        3645

        23

        14.8

        4655

        19

        12.3

        > 55

        8

        5.2

        Occupation

        Student

        64

        41.3

        Teacher

        7

        4.5

        Design professional

        2

        1.3

        Corporate manager

        8

        5.0

        Self-employed

        13

        8.4

        Freelancer

        18

        11.6

        Other

        43

        27.7

        Income (CNY)

        < 3,000

        71

        45.8

        3,0005,000

        35

        22.6

        5,0007,000

        27

        17.4

        7,0009,000

        13

        8.4

        > 9,000

        9

        5.8

        Counts and percentages are reproduced from the source. The income reporting period is not specified.

      2. Clothing Hue Preferences across Narcissism Levels: Fig. 2 presents clothing hue preferences by narcissism level. In the high-narcissism group, preferences were ranked in the following order: red, yellow, purple, blue, and green. Red clothing was the most preferred, followed by yellow. Alt- hough the moderate- and low-narcissism groups differed somewhat in their mean ratings, they exhibited the same pref- erence ranking: blue, purple, red, yellow, and green. Blue clothing was the most preferred in both groups.

        ‌Fig. 2. Clothing hue preferences across narcissism levels.

        The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) are summarized in Table VI. Significant differences were reported between the high- and moderate-narcissism groups and be- tween the high- and low-narcissism groups (p < 0.05). Thus, the hue preferences of individuals with high levels of narcis-

        sism differed from those of individuals with moderate or low levels. The high-narcissism group preferred warm-colored clothing, whereas the moderate- and low-narcissism groups preferred cool-colored clothing. The difference between the moderate- and low-narcissism groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), suggesting no clear difference in cloth- ing preferences between these two groups.

        ‌TABLE VI. ANOVA-BASED COMPARISONS OF CLOTHING HUE PREFERENCES.

        Group I

        Group J

        Mean difference

        SE

        p

        High

        Moderate

        6.183*

        2.892

        0.034

        High

        Low

        9.779*

        2.729

        0.002

        Moderate

        High

        6.183*

        2.892

        0.034

        Moderate

        Low

        3.596

        2.745

        0.192

        Low

        High

        9.779*

        2.729

        0.002

        Low

        Moderate

        3.596

        2.745

        0.192

        Group labels indicate narcissism level. Mean difference = Group I minus Group J.

        *p < 0.05.

      3. Clothing Color Value Preferences across Narcissism Levels: Fig. 3 shows preferences for clothing with different levels of color value. When hue was held constant, individuals with high levels of narcissism preferred high-value clothing, whereas their preferences for moderate- and low-value cloth- ing differed little. Individuals with moderate levels of narcis- sism showed similarly high preferences for low- and moder- ate-value clothing. Individuals with low levels of narcissism preferred low-value clothing.

        ‌Fig. 3. Clothing color value preferences across narcissism levels.

        Pearson correlation analysis indicated a statistically signif- icant association between narcissism and clothing color value preference (r = 0.170, p < 0.05), as shown in Table VII. High- er levels of narcissism were associated with a stronger prefer- ence for high-value clothing, consistent with the pattern of mean preference ratings.

        ‌TABLE VII. CORRELATION BETWEEN NARCISSISM AND CLOTHING COLOR VALUE PREFERENCE.

        Variable

        M

        SD

        Narcissism

        Value

        Narcissism

        67.08

        13.77

        1

        0.170*

        Value preference

        46.21

        8.75

        0.170*

        1

        *p < 0.05.

        As shown in Table VIII, significant differences were re- ported between the high- and moderate-narcissism groups and between the high- and low-narcissism groups (p < 0.05). These results indicated that the high-narcissism group differed from the other two groups in clothing color value preference. Individuals with high levels of narcissism preferred high-value

        clothing, whereas those with moderate or low levels showed the opposite pattern. The difference between the moderate- and low-narcissism groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

        Although individuals with moderate levels of narcissism also exhibited narcissistic traits, their clothing color value preferences were generally similar to those of individuals with low levels. Once narcissism exceeded a certain level, individ- uals tended to favor high-value clothing in an effort to attract attention and present themselves more prominently. High- value colors are visually light and can create an emphasis ef- fect.

        ‌TABLE VIII. ANOVA-BASED COMPARISONS OF CLOTHING COLOR VALUE PREFERENCES.

        Group I

        Group J

        Mean difference

        SE

        p

        High

        Moderate

        6.297*

        1.674

        0.007

        High

        Low

        7.613*

        1.579

        0.007

        Moderate

        High

        6.297*

        1.674

        0.007

        Moderate

        Low

        1.316

        1.589

        0.409

        Low

        High

        7.613*

        1.579

        0.007

        Low

        Moderate

        1.316

        1.589

        0.409

        Group labels indicate narcissism level. Mean difference = Group I minus Group J.

        *p < 0.05.

      4. Clothing Color Chroma Preferences across Narcissism Levels: Fig. 4 presents clothing color chroma preferences by narcissism level. Individuals with high levels of narcissism showed the strongest preference for high-chroma clothing, those with moderate levels showed the strongest preference for moderate-chroma clothing, and those with low levels showed the strongest preference for low-chroma clothing. This pattern suggested that individuals with high levels of narcis- sism favored vivid clothing colors, whereas those with low levels favored muted, grayish colors.

    ‌Fig. 4. Clothing color chroma preferences across narcissism levels.

    Pearson correlation analysis indicated a statistically signif- icant association between narcissism and clothing color chro- ma preference (r = 0.173, p < 0.05), as shown in Table IX. Higher levels of narcissism were associated with a stronger preference for high-chroma clothing, consistent with the mean preference ratings.

    ‌TABLE IX. CORRELATION BETWEEN NARCISSISM AND CLOTHING COLOR CHROMA PREFERENCE.

    Variable

    M

    SD

    Narcissism

    Chroma

    Narcissism

    67.08

    13.77

    1

    0.173*

    Chroma preference

    36.40

    8.75

    0.173*

    1

    *p < 0.05.

    As shown in Table X, all pairwise comparisons between the high-, moderate-, and low-narcissism groups were statisti- cally significant (p < 0.05). This indicated differences in cloth- ing color chroma preferences across all three levels of narcis- sism. Individuals with high, moderate, and low levels of nar- cissism preferred high-, moderate-, and low-chroma clothing, respectively.

    ‌TABLE X. ANOVA-BASED COMPARISONS OF CLOTHING COLOR CHROMA PREFERENCES.

    Group I

    Group J

    Mean difference

    SE

    p

    High

    Moderate

    4.891*

    1.416

    0.003

    High

    Low

    8.321*

    1.336

    0.003

    Moderate

    High

    4.891*

    1.416

    0.003

    Moderate

    Low

    3.429*

    1.344

    0.012

    Low

    High

    8.321*

    1.336

    0.003

    Low

    Moderate

    1.316*

    1.344

    0012

    Group labels indicate narcissism level. Mean difference = Group I minus Group J.

    *p < 0.05.

  4. DISCUSSION

    In contemporary society, clothing serves as a symbolic means of self-expression and social interaction. Color is one of its most apparent visual features and can exert psychologi- cal influence and guide responses. Different colors can also elicit different emotional responses and behavioral tendencies. Through a questionnaire survey, the present study investigated clothing color preferences among individuals with narcissistic traits and identified distinctive patterns.

    The results indicated significant differences in clothing color preferences among individuals with different levels of narcissism. Those with high levels preferred red and yellow hues, high color value, and high chroma. Such colors create visually salient and stimulating impressions that may satisfy the desire for self-presentation. These preferences are con- sistent with the tendency of individuals with narcissistic traits to focus strongly on themselves, attend to how others perceive them, and seek attention. The findings support the conclusions of the related literature discussed above.

  5. CONCLUSION

The survey and analyses yielded three main conclusions:

  1. With respect to clothing hue, individuals with high levels of narcissism preferred visually salient and stimulating colors such as red and yellow. In contrast, individuals with moderate or low levels preferred subdued and restrained colors such as blue and green.

  2. With respect to clothing color value, individuals with high levels of narcissism generally preferred high-value cloth- ing, whereas those with moderate or low levels preferred low-value clothing.

  3. With respect to clothing color chroma, individuals with high levels of narcissism generally preferred high-chroma clothing, those with moderate levels preferred moderate-

chroma clothing, and those with low levels preferred low- chroma clothing.

REFERENCES

  1. J. M. Twenge. Generation Me: Why Todays Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitledand More Miserable Than Ever Before. Free Press, New York, 2006.

  2. S. Konrath, B. J. Bushman, and W. K. Campbell. Attenuating the link between threatened egotism and aggression. Psychological Science, 17:9951001, 2006.

  3. R. F. Baumeister and K. D. Vohs. Narcissism as addiction to esteem.

    Psychological Inquiry, 12:206210, 2001.

  4. H. M. Wallace and R. F. Baumeister. The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personal- ity and Social Psychology, 82:819834, 2002.

  5. J. D. Miller, D. R. Lynam, L. Siedor, M. Crowe, and W. K. Campbell. Consensual lay profiles of narcissism and their connection to the Five- Factor Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 30(1):1018, 2018.

  6. C. Wang, Y. Mei, Y. Zhao, et al. The influence of selfie posting on social networking sites on narcissistic personality among college stu- dents: The mediating role of body image satisfaction. Xinli Yuekan, no. 1:3135, 49, 2023. In Chinese; title translated from the source manu- script.

  7. F. Bozda. The psychological effects of staying home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of General Psychology, 148(3):226 248, 2021.

  8. B. A. S. Martin, H. S. Jin, P. J. OConnor, and C. Hughes. The relation- ship between narcissism and consumption behaviors: A comparison of measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 141:196199, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.014.

  9. T. Veblen. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. The Modern Library, 1934.

  10. S. Z. Cisek, C. Sedikides, C. M. Hart, H. J. Godwin, V. Benson, and

    S. P. Liversedge. Narcissism and consumer behavior: A review and pre- liminary findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 2014. Art. no. 232.

  11. N. S. Holtzman and M. J. Strube. Narcissism and attractiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 44:133136, 2010.

  12. M. D. Back, S. C. Schmukle, and B. Egloff. Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissismpopularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1):132 145, 2010.

  13. S. Vazire, L. P. Naumann, P. J. Rentfrow, and S. D. Gosling. Portrait of a narcissist: Manifestations of narcissism in physical appearance. Jour- nal of Research in Personality, 42(6):14391447, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.007.