Assessment of Household Electronic Waste Generation and Management Practices

Assessment of Household Electronic Waste Generation and Management Practices

Chandra Shekhar Kumar , Rahul Kumar Ranjan, Sujit Kumar, Md. Kalim Ahmad, Deep Raj, Rahul Kumar, Dr. Bimal Kumar

Government Engineering College Jamui, India

ABSTRACT – The production of electronic garbage, or “e- waste,” at the home level has dramatically expanded due to the quick development of technology. Because e-waste contains toxic elements, improper disposal of it presents major threats to the environment and human health. The purpose of this study is to examine current management and disposal methods as well as the amount and kinds of electronic trash produced in households. A standardized Google Form-based survey was used to gather data for the study, allowing for effective and extensive data collecting from respondents. The study asked about the use of electronic devices, how often they were replaced, how old devices were stored, and whether or not they were aware of recycling procedures. To find recurring patterns in the production and disposal of e-waste, the gathered responses were examined. The findings show that a lack of knowledge about appropriate recycling mechanisms causes many homes to amass unused electronics. The study emphasizes how crucial appropriate disposal methods and public awareness are to the long-term management of e-waste. Additionally, digital survey tools like Google Forms work well for gathering and analysing environmental data. The results can help environmental organizations and legislators create plans for better domestic e-waste management and recycling programs.

Keywords Electronic Waste (E-waste), Household Waste Management, E-waste Recycling, Google Form Survey, Environmental Sustainability

1. INTRODUCTION

   Global production of electronic garbage, or “e-waste,” has significantly increased as a result of the quick development of electronic gadgets including computers, televisions, cell phones, and home appliances. A significant portion of this waste stream is produced at the household level by the regular replacement of electronic devices brought about by consumer demand and technological improvements. Hazardous materials including lead, mercury, and cadmium can be released when e-

   waste is improperly disposed of, posing major threats to the environment and human health. Therefore, creating efficient waste management solutions requires an understanding of home e-waste creation and management patterns.

   Digital survey tools, such as Google Forms, have emerged in recent years as an excellent way to gather a lot of data from respondents in a straightforward and economical way. Researchers can collect data on the kinds of electronic devices utilized, disposal procedures, storage of outdated equipment, and knowledge of recycling techniques by using online surveys. This study employs a Google Form-based survey to evaluate household electronic trash creation and current management practices. The results will support sustainable e-waste management methods at the household level and assist in identifying knowledge gaps.

   A structured survey to look into household attitudes and electronic waste disposal methods. According to the findings, just a small percentage of households use official recycling methods to get rid of their unused devices, while many store them at home[1]. Investigated how households replaced and disposed of technological devices. According to the poll, customers regularly replace electronic equipment before they reach the end of their useful lives, which greatly increases the amount of e-waste produced in homes[2]. Evaluated household awareness and behavior regarding e-waste disposal through questionnaire surveys. Findings indicated that limited awareness and inadequate infrastructure hinder effective electronic waste management practices[3]. Results showed that although most participants were aware of e-waste hazards, proper disposal practices were still limited[4]. The perception and knowledge of households regarding electronic waste hazards and management. Results showed that awareness plays a major role in encouraging proper segregation and recycling practices[5]. Examined consumer willingness to participate in electronic waste recycling programs. The results indicated that environmental awareness and social influence significantly affect recycling participation[6]. Household awareness about environmental and health risks associated with electronic waste. It highlighted that increased public education and awareness campaigns are necessary for effective waste management[7]. Global trends in electronic waste generation

   and emphasized the increasing contribution of households to the overall waste stream. The need for improved collection and recycling systems[8]. Many households keep unused electronics due to lack of recycling facilities or emotional attachment to devices. The results suggest the need for convenient collection systems[9].Factors influencing consumer decisions regarding disposal of old electronic devices. It found that environmental concern and awareness significantly influence responsible disposal behavior[10]. Challenges associated with electronic waste management in developing countries. The findings highlighted the importance of awareness campaigns and formal recycling systems[11]. Investigated household disposal behavior using questionnaire surveys. The results indicated that convenience and accessibility of recycling centers strongly influence e-waste disposal decisions[12]. Assessed knowledge and awareness of electronic waste among university students. Results showed that most respondents recognize large appliances as e-waste but are less aware of smaller electronic items[13]. Estimated household e-waste generation rates and collection patterns. The results emphasized the importance of structured collection programs and consumer awareness for effective management[14]. Awareness levels among recyclers and consumers regarding electronic waste hazards. It highlighted the urgent need for improved regulations and education programs in developing countries[15]. Results showed that environmental knowledge and social norms significantly influence responsible waste handling[16]. The environmental and health impacts of improper electronic waste disposal. It emphasized the importance of safe recycling and management practices[17].Examined factors influencing public participation in recycling programs through survey analysis. It concluded that awareness campaigns and economic incentives increase participation rates[18]. Analyzed patterns of electronic device ownership and disposal within households. Findings suggested that rapid technological advancement leads to shorter product life cycles[19].

2. METHODOLOGY

   To estimate the amount of electronic waste generated in households

   To identify commonly used electronic devices

   To study disposal and management practices of e- waste

   To check awareness level about e-waste hazards and recycling

   To analyze household behavior using survey data

   Preparation of Questionnaire

   A questionnaire was designed in Google Form using multiple choice and checkbox questions for easy response collection.

   Validation of Questionnaire Questionnaire checked by teacher / expert Corrections made for clarity

   Pilot survey conducted on 510 respondents Final form prepared in Google Forms

   Primary Data Collection

   Primary data was collected directly from respondents using Google Form survey link.

   Method of distribution:

   • WhatsApp sharin Sample size:

     Research Design

     The present study was conducted using a descriptive survey research design based on primary data collection to assess the generation of household electronic waste and its management practices.

     A structured questionnaire was prepared and distributed through Google Forms, where most questions were provided with checkbox options to allow respondents to select one or more suitable answers.

     Objective of the Study

     The main objectives of the study were:

   • 50100 households Type of data:
   • Primary data

   Flow Chart of Methodology

   Problem Selection

   Literature Review

   Questionnaire Design (Checkbox based)

   Google Form Preparation

   Primary Data Collection

   Data Tabulation

   Data Analysis

   Result & Discussion

   Conclusion & Recommendation

   Figure 1: Respondent Designation

   According to the pie chart, students make up the bulk of the 89 responses, or roughly 86.5% of all participants. Academic staff participation is limited, as seen by the lower percentage of answers from faculty members. Assistant managers, industrial workers, and non-teaching staff make up a very small portion of the sample and provide very few responses. This implies that students make up the majority of survey respondents, which may have an impact on the general perception and data regarding home e-waste generation and management practices.

   Figure 2: e-waste generated approximately in last one year in home (approx. in Kg.)

   With 52 respondents (60.5%) reporting this category, the graph demonstrates that most households produce less than 1 kg of e- waste annually. An estimated 26 respondents (30.2%) produce one to five kg of electronic garbage every year. Thirteen respondents (15.1%) reported producing more than five kilograms of e-waste. This suggests that even if the majority of families generate comparatively little e-waste on an individual basis, the total generation might still be substantial and necessitates appropriate management and recycling procedures.

   Figure 3: Location of e-waste collection

   According to the graph, Jamui had the most e-waste survey responses (28, or 31.8%), showing substantial involvement from this area. With 19 (21.6%) and 15 (17%) responses,

   respectively, Nalanda and Patna also made a sizable contribution. Lakhisarai, Nawada, and Nalanda provided a moderate amount of responses, accounting for 45% of the total. There was little involvement from other places like Samastipur, Vaishali, Gaya, Munger, and Sasaram, as seen by their minimal percentage contributions.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

   Figure 4: Type of e-waste generated

   Based on 88 survey results, the graph shows the various forms of e-waste produced by homes. Batteries (60.2%) and cell phones (59.1%) account for the largest percentage of e-waste, suggesting that small electronic gadgets are the most commonly discarded products. Another major contributor to the production of domestic e-waste is lighting equipment (55.7%). Washing machines (15.9%), refrigerators (14.8%), and computers (13.6%), which are replaced less frequently because of their longer lifespans, produce moderate volumes of e-waste. A lesser but significant portion of electronic trash is made up of devices like printers (8%) and televisions (18.2%). Only a small portion is contributed by a few additional objects, such as cables, chargers, fans, and remote controls, suggesting that these electronic devices are occasionally thrown away.

   Figure 5: Best Solution of reducing e-waste generation

   Based on 88 responses, the graph displays the respondents’ thoughts on the best ways to lower the production of e-waste. The majority of participants59 respondents, or 67%think that the best way to cut down on e-waste is to upgrade and repair current gadgets. To guarantee the disposal and recycling of electronic goods, a sizable portion of respondents55, or 62.5%also advocate using certified recycling services. 28 respondents (31.8%) recommended cutting back on the use of new electronic equipment, underscoring the significance of making smart purchases. Furthermore, according to 26 respondents (29.5%), donating used electronics can prolong their useful lives and cut down on wasteJust a small portion recommended further possibilities, including monitoring carbon footprints or other simple fixes. Overall, the findings show that recycling, reuse, and repair are commonly acknowledged as essential tactics for managing e-waste sustainably.

4. CONCLUSIONS

The results of the survey show that several districts actively participated, with Jamui providing the most responses, followed by Nalanda and Patna. This suggests that people in these areas are more conscious of and involved with e-waste issues. The analysis also shows that most respondents think the best way to reduce e-waste is to upgrade and repair existing equipment. The significance of appropriate disposal and ecologically conscious recycling techniques is further demonstrated by the robust support for certified recycling services. Growing awareness of sustainable consumption and reuse is demonstrated by the moderate support for donating used electronics and cutting back on the purchase of new ones.

Overall, the results highlight that the most practicable methods for reducing the production of e-waste are generally

acknowledged to be repair, reuse, and recycling. Environmental protection and sustainable electronic waste management can both greatly benefit from these tactics.

In order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of e- waste management procedures, future research can extend the survey to encompass a bigger population in additional districts. To encourage responsible electronic usage and recycling, awareness campaigns and educational initiatives can be put into place. Effective regulations and infrastructure for sustainable e- waste management can also be developed through cooperation with governmental organizations and accredited recyclers.

REFERENCES

1. Silva, A. L., et al. (2022). Household practices regarding e-waste management: A case study from Brazil. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 28, 102723.
2. Nowakowski, P., & Szwarc, K. (2022). Household e-waste management: A case study of Wroclaw, Poland. Sustainability, 14(18), 11753.
3. Hussin, N. E. H., Ali, N. E. H., & Khalil, N. (2023). E-waste management systems in Shah Alam City: Household awareness and behavior. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(4), 160173.
4. Kariwala, P., Kandpal, S. D., Dixit, S., Singh, A. K., Pathak, A., & Singh,

   S. (2023). Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding electronic waste management among users of electronic equipment in Lucknow city. Indian Journal of Community Health, 35(1), 6773.

5. Makhado, L., et al. (2021). Appraisal of households knowledge and perception towards e-waste management in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Recycling, 6(2), 39.
6. Islam, M. T., Huda, N., & Mahmud, M. A. (2021). Survey and analysis of consumers behaviour for electronic waste management in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management, 282, 111943.
7. Ongondo, F. O., Williams, I. D., & Cherrett, T. J. (2011). How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electronic waste. Waste Management, 31(4), 714730.
8. Baldé, C. P., Forti, V., Gray, V., Kuehr, R., & Stegmann, P. (2017). The global e-waste monitor 2017. United Nations University.
9. Wilson, G. T., Smally, G., Suckling, J. R., Lilley, D., Lee, J., & Mawle,

   R. (2017). The hibernating mobile phone: Dead storage as a barrier to efficient electronic waste recovery. Waste Management, 60, 521533.

10. Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, X. (2011). Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(910), 977984.
11. Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., & Böni, H. (2005). Global perspectives on e-waste. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), 436458
12. Saphores, J. D. M., Nixon, H., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2006). Household willingness to recycle electronic waste. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(4), 14731481.
13. Perera, C., et al. (2025). Promoting sustainability in e-waste management: Comparison of household practices and awareness between STEM and non-STEM students. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management.
14. Ylä-Mella, J., et al. (2025). Quantification of e-waste collection count at household level. Indicators, 100898.
15. Arya, S., Gupta, A., & Bhardwaj, A. (2019). Awareness of recyclers about e-waste: A survey conducted in northern states of India. International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(1), 3439.
16. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179211.
17. Robinson, B. H. (2009). E-waste: An assessment of global production and environmental impacts. Science of the Total Environment, 408(2), 183 191.
18. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Bates, M. P. (2004). Determining the drivers for household recycling behaviour. Waste Management & Research, 22(3), 181191.
19. Kiddee, P., Naidu, R., & Wong, M. H. (2013). Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Management, 33(5), 1237 1250.