 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 13
 Authors : S. M. Patel , T. A. Jadhav , V. N. Kapatkar
 Paper ID : IJERTV8IS090016
 Volume & Issue : Volume 08, Issue 09 (September 2019)
 Published (First Online): 09092019
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Analysis of Load Locations and Magnitudes on Performance Parameters of Journal Bearing
T. A. Jadhav, S M Patel, V N Kapatkar
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Sinhgad College of Engineering, Vadgaon, (Bk), Pune, 411041, India (Savitribai Phule Pune University)
Abstract In past few years a compact design of journal bearing has been used in most of the industrial applications. Hence there is need to develop the test bench to assess the performance characteristics. Where journal bearings are used under severe operating conditions, it is observed that, due to the high load imposed on the shaft, shaft starts deforming which causes change in oil film thickness, oil film temperature and subsequent misalignment in the bearings. Hence, experimental analysis was carried out for two load locations and having different magnitudes. One is for maximum center load of 100 N at 1440 rpm and second is maximum eccentric load of 100 N at 250 rpm, 350 rpm and 450 rpm. The results show that oil film thickness, oil film temperature depends on loading conditions. If load increases oil film thickness decreases, oil film temperature increases and misalignment increases. Using dimensionless analysis, a mathematical model is formulated which predicts the oil film thickness. The results obtained by mathematical model are in good agreement with experiential results.
Keywords Buckingham method, oil film thickness, oil film temperature and misalignment.

INTRODUCTION
Journal bearing is most common hydrodynamic bearing which provide support and relative motion between rotor system. A journal bearing widely used in industrial applications such as heavy machinery, turbines and centrifugal pumps etc. The main problem of high rotating machinery is faulty bearing design or faulty assembly techniques, lead to excessive vibrations. To avoid these excessive vibrations in machinery, there is need to select appropriate operating parameters including misalignment of bearing as well. Sometimes journal bearing operate under severe operating conditions which causes increase in temperature and misalignment. Misalignment depends on manufacturing and assembly defect.
Several researchers have analyzed the misalignment aspect for journal bearing by experimental as well as analytical methods. Jun Sun et al,[1] presented analytical method to calculate film pressure, film thickness and misalignment, when shaft deformation occurred. They observed that misalignment has little influences on load capacity and coefficient of friction. J. Bouyer, M. Fillen, et al. [2] carried out experimental analysis to calculate minimum film thickness, misalignment maximum pressure and concluded that maximum pressure at mid plane decreased by 20 percent and minimum oil thickness was reduced by 80 percent. Further R. H. Buckholz, et al. [3] described non Newtonian
lubrication in partial arc journal bearing to calculate misalignment and results were compared with numerial analysis and experimental results. Chao Zhang, et al. [4] developed steady state mixed THED (thermoelssto hydrodyanmic) model for journal bearing. They concluded that the shaft deformation and misalignment should considered in mixed lubrication analysis. Jun Sun, et al. [5] used experimental analysis to calculate oil film thickness, oil film temperature and misalignment in journal bearing and results shows that misalignment depend upon load factor, if load increases, misalignment also increase. Further J.O. Medwell et al. [6] used analysis to calculate pressure and temperature of journal bearing. They used Reynolds and energy equation to solve misalignment problem and concluded that bearing failure due to distortion of pressure and temperature field of misalignment shaft. B.Kucinschi et al. [7] carried out experimental analysis to determine temperature distribution in steady state journal bearing. The effect of journal speed on bearing temperature was analyzed. They observed that temperature was different while slow startup as compare to rapid startup. L.Costa et al. [8] studied experimentally using single groovebearing to calculate shaft temperature, flow rate and bush torque. The result shows that characteristics of bearing are so sensitive. If groove position changes by 300 then the reduction occurred in temperature, pressure while flow rate increases. Monmousseau et al. [9] investigated rise in temperature of tiltpad bearing and compared. They observed that while heat transfer in bearing elements realistic model should consider and also observed that if thermoelastic deformations are considered there is good agreement between experimental and theoretical temperature. Further Ravindra Mallya et al.
[10] presented numerical analysis to calculate misalignment, load capacity, friction coefficient and side leakage of three axial groove bearing had groove angles 36Â° and 18Â°. The results show that load capacity and side leakage of 18Â° bearing is more than 36Â°, coefficient of friction of 18Â° bearing is less as compared to 36Â° bearing, misalignment depend on coefficient of friction. Boedo et al. [11] used numerical analysis to calculate misalignment in grooveless bearing. It was found that effects of bearing misalignment on load capacity was limited to endplane journal eccentricity ratios close to 1. Further M.O.A Mokhtar et al. [12] explained adiabatic analysis to calculate misalignment of journal bearing. They observed that thermal effect was pronounced for journal bearing. ZS Zhang et al. [13] described numerical analysis (3D Reynold equation) to identify effect of thermalon plain journal bearing. They conclude that thermal effect had not been ignored because their significant influence on oil film thickness and other parameters of bearing. J.Y. Jang et al. [14] explained comprehensive analysis of misalignment journal bearing, it was based on 3D massconservative thermohydrodynamic model. The results presented in numerical solution were useful to examine misalignment in journal bearing.
Aim of this work is to study the effect of loads location and magnitudes on oil film thickness, oil temperature and misalignment of shaft by experimental approach. Further based on experimental results, the mathematical models are formulated by using dimensional analysis approach which predicts oil film thickness. Analytical results are compared with experimental results.

MATHEMATICAL MODELING
Dimensional analysis method is use to reduce complex dependence physical quantity into simplest form to analyses theoretical and experimental results. There are some basic physical quantities such as length (L), mass (M), time (T) and temperature(K) required for formation of dimensionless parameters. In this analysis Buckingham method is used to construct the mathematical model. If there are n variables in a system and these variables contain m fundamental dimensions the equation relating all the variables will have (nm) dimensionless groups.
In this application oil film thickness (t) is dependent variable while speed of journal (N), viscosity of oil (Âµ) , load applied on journal (W), temperature of fluid film (T) and clearance between journal and bearing (C) are independent variables. The functional equation between dependent and independent variables can be expressed as ;
t = f (N, Âµ, W, T, C) (1)
or
f (t, N, Âµ, T, C) = 0 (2)
In this problem, Number of variables = n = 6, Number of fundamental dimensions = m = 4,
Thus, Number of dimensionless groups = nm = 64 = 2 Therefore, equation can be expressed as;
f ( , ) = 0 (3)
Solving equations 3, 4 and 5 we get values of and . For ;
[ ] = ] ] ] ]] ]Therefore,
M = 0 = , = .
L = 0 = – +1, = .
T = 0 = – , = .
K = 0 = – , = 0.
Therefore,
= [ ] t
= (6)
For ;
[] = ] ] ] ]] ]Therefore,
M = 0 = , = .
L = 0 = – +1, = .
T = 0 = – , = . K = 0 = – , = 0.
Therefore,
= [ ] C
= (7)
Now putting experimental results in equations 6 and 7, will get values of and . Further plotting v/s , and using curve fitting tool , we get a quadratic equation for center loading and eccentric loading. For this experiment viscosity of oil is 0.061 at 50 to 60Â°C is used.
A. Theoretical calculations for center loading
For C = 0.2 at 1440rpm
Fig 1 shows graph of dimensionless oil film thickness ( and dimensionless clearance .
Therefore,
= [ ] t (4)
= [ ] C (5)
Table 1 shows parameters and their SI unit and fundamental dimensions.
TABLE 1. SI unit and fundamental dimension.
Parameter
SI unit
Fundamental dimensions
Oil film thickness (t)
mm
[L] Speed (N)
RPM
[ ] Viscosity (Âµ)
[M ] Load (W)
Kg
[M] Temperature (T)
K
[K] Clearance I
mm
[L] Fig. 1. Dimensionless oil film thickness () v/s dimensionless clearance ().
From fig. 1 the linear quadratic equations in terms of and is developed by using curve fitting method and expressed as follows;
Liner quadratic equation for oil film thickness (Front) is,
= 1.0547 2E09 (8)
Liner quadratic equation for oil film thickness (Rear) is,
= 0.9001 + 2E09 (9)
Fig. 2 shows graph of experimental and theoretical oil film thickness v/s Load (N) for C = 0.2 at 1440 rpm.
Fig. 2. Experimental and theoretical oil film thickness v/s Load (N) for C =
0.2 at 1440 rpm.
The graphs and equations of remaining parameters of center and eccentric loading have the similar trends hence these results are not presented in this paper.
From above Figure 2 it concludes that theoretical oil film thickness are almost close with experimental oil film thickness.
loading above whole procedure is same but loading condition is different, where load is applied near to both bearings. When shaft starts rotating due to eccentric weight centrifugal force is developed. In case of eccentric loading we use 3 phase autotransformer to reduce rpm for three different speeds such as 250 rpm, 350 rpm and 450 rpm.
a)
b)

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS
The schematic of experimental test rig is shown in Figure 3 a) and a systematic view of test bush and sensor mounting assembly as shown in Figure 3 b) while actual photograph of test ring installed in laboratory is presented in Figure 3 c). The test ring is used to analyze the effect of load magnitudes and locations on performance parameters such as oil film thickness and temperature and, misalignment of journal bearing. For this experiment nylon 66 material bushes are used.
Analysis is carried out at two conditions; one is center loading and second one eccentric loading. In case of center loading motor speed of 1440 rpm is used and load is applied at the center of shaft. One end of shaft is coupled to motor via supporting bearing and at other end of shaft test bush is assembled, where sensors are embedded in lubricated test bearing at appropriate locations. Due to applying load at the center of the shaft, shaft start deforming which causes change in oil film thickness, oil film temperature and misalignment. An oil film thickness is measured by IR sensor and oil film temperature is measured by temperature sensor and misalignment is calculated by theoretical approach. If load increases oil film thickness decreases, oil film temperature increases and misalignment increases. In case of eccentric
c)
Fig. 3. a) Schematic diagram of experimental setup; b) test bush and sensor mounting assembly; c) Photograph of test rig.
Table 2 shows parameters used for experimental analysis.
TABLE 2. Parameters of journal bearing, shaft, operating condition and lubricant properties
Bearing diameter D (mm)
I.D =30, O.D = 40
Bearing length (mm)
67
Radial clearance C (mm)
0.2,0.4,0.5
Rotating speed (RPM)
1440
Lubricant used
SAE W30
Shaft length between two bearings (mm)
1000
Shaft diameter d (mm)
30
Young Modulus for shaft material E (Gpa)
210

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this section the results corresponding to effect of center and eccentric loads on test bearing and behavior of oil film thickness, oil temperature and misalignment angle are presented.

For Centre Loading
Fig. 6 shows that graph for oil film thickness v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 1440 rpm.
Fig. 6. Oil film thickness v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at
1440 rpm.
From above fig. 6, it concludes that oil film thickness decreases due to increasing load and decreasing viscosity of oil.
Fig. 7 shows graph for oil film temperature v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 1440 rpm.
Fig. 7. Oil film temperature v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 1440 rpm.
From above fig. 7, it concludes that oil film temperature increase due to increasing load.

Misalignment angle for center load
The force acting on the center of the shaft causes the shaft deformation; hence the journal misalignment occurred. Based
on the calculations of deformation of beam acted by the concentrative force, the angle of journal misalignment in the bearing hole can calculated by following expression;
Slope = (10)
Where,
= Angle of misalignment in bearing hole, P = Force acting on the center of shaft, l = Length of shaft, E = Modulus of elasticity, I = Moment of inertia.
From fig. 8 it concludes that if load increases misalignment increases.
Fig. 8: Load v/s misalignment angle.

For Eccentric Loading
Fig. 9 shows that graph for oil film thickness v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 250 rpm.
Fig. 9. Oil film thickness v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 250 rpm.
Fig. 10 shows that graph for oil film thickness v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 350 rpm.
Fig. 10. Oil film thickness v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 350 rpm.
Fig. 11 shows that graph for oil film thickness v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 450 rpm.
Fig. 11. Oil film thickness v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 450 rpm.
Fig.12 shows that graph for oil film temperature v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 250 rpm.
Fig. 12. Oil film temperature v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 250 rpm.
Fig. 13. Shows that graph for oil film temperature v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 350 rpm.
Fig. 13. Oil film temperature v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 350 rpm.
Fig. 14 shows that graph for oil film temperature v/s load for clearance C = 0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 450 rpm.
Fig 14. Oil film temperature v/s Load for clearance C=0.2, 0.4 and 0.5 at 450 rpm.
From figs 9, 10 and 11 it concludes that oil film decreases due to increasing load and decreasing viscosity of oil.
From figs. 12, 13 and 14 it concludes that oil film temperature increase due to increasing load.
li>
Misalignment angle for eccentric load
The force acting on the eccentric of the shaft causes the shaft deformation; hence the journal misalignment occurred. According to Maxwells theorem of reciprocal displacements if the two loads are now made equal, then
= (11)
slope = tan = 0.062 (12)
Where,
= Angle of misalignment in bearing hole, P = Force acting on the center of shaft, l = Length of shaft, E = Modulus of elasticity, I = Moment of inertia.
From fig. 15 it concludes that if load increases misalignment increase.
Fig. 15. Load v/s Misalignment angle.


CONCLUSIONS
Effect of load locations and magnitudes on journal bearing performance is analyzed experimentally. It is observed that as load increases oil film thickness depresses, misalignment increases and temperature increases for all loading conditions. However, still more number of experiments are required to obtain optimum values for satisfactory performance of the bearings. The mathematical models are constructed based on dimensional analysis approach and observed good correlation between experimental and analytical results.
REFERENCES

Sun, J., and Gui, C. L., Hydrodynamic Lubrication Analysis of JournalBearing Considering Misalignment Caused by Shaft Deformation, Tribol. Int.37, 2004.

Bouyer, J., and Fillon, M., An Experimental Analysis of MisalignmentEffects on Hydrodynamic Plain Journal Bearing Performances, ASME J. Tribol., 124, 2002

Buckholz, R. H., and Lin, J. F., The Effect of Journal Bearing Misalignment on Load and Cavitation for nonNewtonian Lubricants, ASME J.Tribol., 108, 1986.

Yansong Wang a,, Chao Zhang a, mixedTEHD analysis and experiment of journal bearings under severe operating conditions. Tribology International 35, 2002.

Jun Sun, Changlin Gui, An Experimental Study of JournalBearing Lubrication Effected by Journal Misalignment as a Result of Shaft Deformation Under Load, Tribol. Int. , 2005.

Medwell, J. O., and Gethin, D. T., Synthesis of Thermal Effects in Misaligned Hydrodynamic Journal Bearings, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 6, 1986,.

Kucinschi, B., and Fillon, M., An Experimental Study of Transient Thermal Effects in a Plain Journal Bearing, ASME J. Tribol., 121,1999.

Costa, L., Fillon, M., Miranda, A. S., and Claro, J. C. P., An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Groove Location and Supply Pressure on the THD Performance of a Steadily Loaded Journal Bearing, ASME J. Tribol., 122, 2000.

Monmousseau, P., Fillon, M., and Frene, J., Transient Thermoelastohydrodynamic Study of TiltingPad Journal Bearings Comparison Between Experimental Data and Theoretical Results, ASME J. Tribol., 119,1997 .

Ravindra Mallya1, Satish B Shenoy2 and Raghuvir Pai1, Steady state characteristics of misaligned multiple axial groove waterlubricated journal bearing, J Engineering Tribology,2015.

Boedo, S., and Booker, J. F., Classic Bearing Misalignment and Edge Loading: A Numerical Study of Limiting Cases, ASME J. Tribol., 126, 2004.

Mokhtar, M. O. A., Safar, Z. S., and AbdElRahman, M. A. M., An Adiabatic Solution of Misaligned Journal Bearings, ASME J. Tribol. 107, 1985.

ZS Zhang1,2, XD Dai1,2 and YB Xie1,2, Thermoelastohydrodynamic behavior of misaligned plain journal bearings,, J Mechanical Engineering Science, 227(11), 2013.

J. Y. Jang, M. M. Khonsari1, On the Behavior of Misaligned Journal Bearings Based on MassConservative Thermohydrodynamic Analysis,2010.