 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 21
 Authors : A. Rathinam, S. Deenadhayalan
 Paper ID : IJERTCONV3IS16188
 Volume & Issue : TITCON – 2015 (Volume 3 – Issue 16)
 Published (First Online): 30072018
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
An Intelligent Techniques for Facts Device with Matrix Converter using Large Bus System
1A. Rathinam,
Department ofelectrical& electronics engineering, Paavai engineering college,
Pachal, Namakkal.
2 S. Deenadhayalan,
Department ofelectrical& electronics engineering, Paavai engineering college,
Pachal,namakkal
Abstract A direct power control (DPC) for three phase matrix converters operating as unified power flow controllers (UPFCs).Matrix converters (MCs) allow the direct ac/ac power conversion without dc energy storage links; therefore, the MCbased UPFC (MCUPFC) has reduced volume and cost, reduced capacitor power losses, together with higher reliability. principles of direct power control (DPC) based on sliding mode control techniques are established for an MCUPFC dynamic model including the input filter. Experimental results of DPC controllers for MCUPFC show decoupled active and reactive power control, zero steadystate tracking error, and fast response times.
This paper presents a direct power control (DPC) for threephase matrix converters operating as unified power flow controllers (UPFCs).Matrix converters (MCs) allow the direct ac/ac power conversion without dc energy storage links; therefore, the MCbased UPFC (MCUPFC) has reduced volume and cost, reduced capacitor power losses, together with higher reliability.
The existence of a dc capacitor bank originates additional losses, decreases the converter lifetime, and increases its weight, cost, and volume. Results show no steadystate errors, no crosscoupling, insensitivity to non modeled dynamics and fast response times, thus confirming the expected performance of the presented nonlinear DPC methodology. The performance of the proposed direct control system was evaluated with a detailed simulation model using the MATLAB/Simulink
Index terms Direct power control (DPC), AC/AC converter, matrix converter (MC), unified powerflow controller (UPFC), MATLAB/ SIMULINK.
NOMENCLUTURE
I.INTRODUCTION
In the last few years, electricity market deregulation, together with growing economic, environmental, and social concerns, has increased the difficulty to burn fossil fuels, and to obtain new licenses to build transmission lines (rightsofway) and highpower facilities. This situation started the growth of decentralized electricity generation (using renewable energy resources). Unified powerflow controllers (UPFC) enable the operation of power transmission networks near their maximum ratings, by enforcing power flow through welldefined lines. These days, UPFCs are one of the most versatile and powerful flexible ac transmission systems (FACTS) devices.
This paper presents a direct power control (DPC) for threephase matrix converters operating as unified power flow controllers (UPFCs).Matrix converters (MCs) allow the direct ac/ac power conversion without dc energy storage links; therefore, the MCbased UPFC (MCUPFC) has reduced volume and cost, reduced capacitor power losses, together with higher reliability[1]. Theoretical principles of direct power control (DPC) based on sliding mode control techniques are established for an MCUPFC dynamic model including the input filter. As a result, line active and reactive power, together with ac supply reactive power, can be directly controlled by selecting an appropriate matrix converter switching state guaranteeing good steadystate and dynamic responses. Experimental results of DPC controllers for MCUPFC show decoupled active and reactive power control, zero steadystate tracking error, and fast response times.
Compared to an MCUPFC using active and reactive power linear controllers based on a modified Venturini highfrequency [3] PWM modulator, the experimental results of the advanced DPCMC guarantee faster responses without overshoot and no steadystate error, presenting no crosscoupling in dynamic and steadystate responses. The existence of a dc capacitor bank originates
Kp,Kq ep
eq
proportional gains active power error reactive power error
additional losses, decreases the converter lifetime, and increases its weight, cost, and volume .These converters are capable of performing the same ac/ac conversion, allowing bidirectional power flow, guaranteeing near sinusoidal input
Vd,Vq matrix converter voltage in dq
components
id,iq input current in dq component
and output currents, voltages with variable amplitude, and adjustable power factor .
These minimum energy storage ac/ac converters have the capability to allow independent reactive control on the UPFC shunt and series converter sides, while
Sp ep , t
Kp Pref
P 0
3
guaranteeing that the active power exchanged on the UPFC series connection is always supplied/absorbed by the shunt connection. In the dependence of the matrix converter output voltage on the modulation coefficient was investigated, concluding that MCUPFC is able to control the full range of power flow. In the last few years, direct power control techniques have been used in many power applications, due to their simplicity and good performance.
In order to design UPFCs, presenting robust behavior to parameter variations and to disturbances, the proposed DPCMC control method, is based on sliding modecontrol techniques, allowing the realtime selection of adequate matrix vectors to control input and output electrical power. Sliding modebased DPCMC controllers can guarantee zero steadystate errors and no overshoots, good tracking performance, and fast dynamic responses, while being simpler to implement and requiring less processing power, when compared to proportionalintegral
SQ eQ , t kQ Qref Q 0 4
converter sides, while guaranteeing that the active power exchanged on the UPFC series connection is always supplied/absorbed by the shunt connection .The proportional gain Kp and kQ are chosen to impose appropriate switching frequencies.

INE ACTIVE AND REACTIVE DIRECT SWITCHING LOSS
The DPC uses a nonlinear law, based on errors eQ and eP to select in real time the matrix converter switching states(vectors). Since there are no modulators and/or pole zerobased approaches, high control speed is possible .To guarantee stability for active power and reactive power controllers, the slidingmode stability conditions (5.5) and (5.6) must be verified.
.
(PI) linear controllers obtained from linear active and reactive power models of UPFC using a modified Venturini highfrequency PWM modulator.

DIRECT POWER CONTROL OF MCUPFC
SP eP ,t SP eP ,t 0
.
.
S e ,t SQ e ,t 0
5
6

Line Active And Reactive Power Sliding Surfaces
In this section The DPC controllers for line power flow are here derived based on the sliding mode control theory. In steady state, Vd is imposed by source Vs. the transmission line currents can be considered as state variables with first order dynamics dependent on the sources and time constant
of impedance L 2 / R 2.
Q Q Q
These conditions mean that if SP(eP,t) >0.then the SP(eP,t) value must be decreased meaning that its time derivative should be negative SQ eQ ,t 0. According to (3) and
(5), the criteria to choose the matrix vector should be
.
Therefore, transmissionline active and reactive powers present firstorder dynamics and have a strong relative

If
SP eP , t
0
s ep , t 0 P Pref
p
then
degree of one , sinc from the control viewpoint, its first time derivative already contains the control variable (the strong relative degree generally represents the number of
choose a vector suitable to increase P
.
times the control output variable must be differentiated until a control input appears explicitly in the dynamics)

If
SP eP ,t
0
s ep , t 0 P Pref
p
then
.From the sliding mode control theory, robust sliding surfaces to control the P and Q variables with a relatively strong degree of one can be obtained considering proportionality to a linear combination of the errors of the state variables .Therefore, define the active power error e P and the reactive power error e Q as the difference between the power references the actual transmitted powers pref
,Qref and the actual transmitted powers P,Q respectively.
choose a vector suitable to decrease P

If SP(eP,t) =0 then choose a vector which does not significantly change the active power.
The same procedure should be applied to the reactive power error.
To design the DPC control system, the six vectors of
ep
Pref
P
eQ Qref Q
(1)
(2) Then,
group I will not be used, since they require extra algorithms to calculate their timevarying phase [6]. From group II, the variable amplitude vectors, only the 12
the robust sliding surfaces
Sp ep
,t
an S
Q eQ
,t
must
highest amplitude voltage vectors are certain to be able to guarantee the previously discussed required levels of VLq
be proportional to these errors, being zero after reaching sliding mode
and VLq needed to fulfill the reaching conditions. The lowest amplitude voltages vectors, or the three null vectors of group III, could be used for near zero errors.
If the control errors ep and eq are quantized using two hysteresis comparators, each with three levels (1.0 and
+1), nine output voltage error combinations are obtained. If a twolevel comparator is used to control the shunt reactive power, as discussed in next subsection, 18 error combinations will be defined, enabling the selection of 18 vectors. Since the three zero vectors have a minor influence on the shunt reactive power control, selecting one out 18 vectors is adequate.
Using the same reasoning for the remaining eight active and reactive power error combinations and generalizing it for all other input voltage sectors, Table I is obtained
.These P, Q controllers were designed based on control laws not dependent on system parameters, but only on the errors of the controlled output to ensure robustness to parameter variations or operating conditions and allow system order reduction, minimizing response times



DIRECT CONTROL OF MATRIX CONVERTERS INPUT REACTIVE POWER
In addition, the matrix converter UPFC can be controlled to ensure a minimum or a certain desired reactive power at the matrix converter input. Similar to the previous considerations, since the voltage source input filter dynamics has a strong relative degree of two, then a
suitable sliding surface SQ eQ,t will be a linear
combination of the desired reactive power error
eQi Qiref Qi and its first order time derivative The time derivative can be approximated by a discrete time difference, KQi as has been chosen to obtain a suitable switching frequency, since as stated
power Qi can be determined by knowing the location of the input voltages and the location of the output current.

MATRIX CONVERTER
The Matrix Converter is a forced commutated converter which uses an array of controlled bidirectional switches as the main power elements to create a variable output voltage system with unrestricted frequency. It does not have any dclink circuit and does not need any large energy storage elements .
The key element in a Matrix Converter is the fully controlled fourquadrant bidirectional switch, which allows highfrequency operation. The early work dedicated to unrestricted frequency changers used thyristors with external forced commutation circuits to implement the bidirectional controlled Each output phase can be connected to any input phase at any timeSwitching pattern and commutation control must avoid line to line short circuits at the input Switching pattern and commutation control must avoid open circuits at the output (assuming inductive load) Switch duty cycles are modulated so that the average output voltage follows the desired reference (for example a sinusoidal reference) Average input current is sinusoidal when the input voltage, output reference and output current are sinusoidal .
The introduction of power transistors for implementing the bidirectional switches made the matrix converter topology more attractive .However, the real development of matrix converters starts with the work of Venturini and Alesina published in 1980. They presented the power circuit of the converter as a matrix of bidirectional power switches and they introduced the name
S eQi, t Q Q k d Q
Q 7
matrix converter. One of their main contributions is the
Qi iref i Qi dt iref i
Supposing that there is enough iq amplitude, (7) are used to establish the criteria (8) to choose the ad equate matrix input current vector that imposes the needed sign of the matrix inputphase current iq related to the outputphase current by
development of a rigorous mathematical analysis to describe the lowfrequency behavior of the converter, introducing the lowfrequency modulation matrix concept. In their modulation method, also known as the direct transfer function approach, the output voltages are obtained by the multiplication of the modulation (also called transfer) matrix with the input voltages.

INPUT FILTERS
1. If S e ,t 0 S e ,t 0
then
Filters must be used at the input of the matrix
Qi Qi Qi Qi
choose a vector current iq < 0 to increase Qi

If SQi eQi ,t 0 SQi eQi ,t 0 then
choose a vector current iq >0 to decrease Qi
Before, this sliding surface needs to be quantized only in two levels (1 and +1) using one hysteresis comparator. The sliding mode is reached when vectors applied to the converter have the necessary iq current amplitude to satisfy stability conditions. Therefore, to choose the most adequate vector in the chosen dq reference frame, it is necessary to know the output currents location since the iq input current depends on the output currents (Table I). Considering that the dqaxis location is synchronous with the input voltage (i.e., dq reference frame depends on the input voltage location), the sign of the matrix reactive
converters to reduce the switching frequency harmonics present in the input current.

To have a cutoff frequency lower than the switching frequency of the converter;

To minimize its reactive power at the grid frequency

To minimize the volume and weight for capacitors and chokes

To minimize the filter inductance voltage drop at rated current in order to avoid a reduction in the voltage transfer ratio

It must be noticed that this filter does not need to store energy coming from the load. Several filter configurations like simple LC and multistage LC have been investigated [2]. It has been shown that simple LC filtering is the best alternative considering cost and size.
Fig 1. Modeling of matrix converter
Due to the LC configuration of the input filter, some problems appear during the powerup procedure of the matrix converter. It is well known that an LC circuit can create overvoltage during transient operation. The connection of damping resistors ,to reduce over voltages is proposed in [3].The damping resistors are short circuited when the converter is running. The use of dampin resistors connected in parallel to the input reactors is proposed in [3].
The control of the instantaneous active and reactive powers requires the measurement of
voltages and output currents necessary to calculate sliding surfaces. The output currents measurement is also used to determine the location of the input currents component. The control of the matrix converter input reactive power requires the input currents measurement to calculate . At each time instant, the most suitable matrix vector is chosen upon the discrete values of the sliding surfaces, using tables derived from Tables I and II for all voltage sectors.
TABLE I : StateSpace Vectors Selection, For Input Voltages Located At Sector
Using the same reasoning for the remaining eight active and reactive power error combinations and generalizing it for all other input voltage sectors, Table I is obtained
.These P, Q controllers were designed based on control laws not dependent on system parameters, but only on the errors of the controlled output to ensure robustness to parameter variations or operating conditions and allow system order reduction, minimizing response times .


SIMULATION RESULTS
The performance of the proposed direct control system was evaluated with a detailed simulation model using the MATLAB/Simulink Sim Power Systems to represent the matrix converter, transformers, sources and transmission lines, and Simulink blocks to simulate the control system. Ideal switches were considered to simulate matrix converter semiconductors minimizing simulation times
Fig 2.Modeling of vector selection block
Matrix converter was built by using three semiconductor modules from DANFOSS, each one with six 1200V 25A insulatedgate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) with an anti parallel diode in a common collector arrangement. To input filter parameter variation, the ability to operate at low switching frequencies, and insensitivity to switching nonlinearity. The harmonics are nearly 30 dB below the 50Hz fundamental for the line current, and 22 dB below the 50Hz fundamental for the matrix converter current.
Fig 6.1 Modeling of UPFC with matrix converter
Digital Simulations are carried out in MATLAB 7.11.0 (R2010b) & was run for 10s with the controller. The step size for 3 simulations was taken to be very small so that we get very accurate results. For the software implementation purposes, a 3 generator 9 bus system with 220 KV line and 100 MVA generators is considered.
DPC controller ability to operate at lower witching frequencies, the DPC gains were lowered and the input filter parameters were changed accordingly to lower the switching frequency to nearly 1.4 kHz.
Fig 4. Active power response for Matrix converter .
Fig 5. Reactive power response for Matrix converter.
Fig 6. Line current for P and Q
Fig 7. Line current (iA,iB) and input matrix converter current (ic,id).

CONCLUSION

In the present method the Matrix Converter based UPFC was implemented in the single bus system where as in this paper it is implemented in three bus system and derived advanced nonlinear direct power controllerswas derived based on sliding mode control techniques, for matrix converters connected to power transmission lines as UPFCs. Presented simulation and experimental results show that active and reactive power flow can be advantageously controlled by using the proposed DPC. Results show no steadystate errors, no crosscoupling, insensitivity to non modeled dynamics and fast response times, thus confirming the expected performance of the presented nonlinear DPC methodology. The obtained DPC MC results were compared to PI linear active and reactive power controllers using a modified Venturini high frequency PWM modulator. Despite showing a suitable dynamic response, the PI performance is inferior when compared to DPC. Furthermore, the PI controllers and modulator take longer times to compute. Obtained results
show that DPC is a strong nonlinear control candidate for line active and reactive power flow. It ensures transmissionline power control as well as sending end reactive power or power factor control.
REFERENCES

D. Jagan, K. Suresh Advanced Direct Power Control Method of UPFC by Using Matrix Converter, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) Vol.2, Issue.4, JulyAug. 2012.

F. Gao and M. Iravani, Dynamic model of a space vector modulated matrix converter, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2007.

Fujita H., Akagi, H., Watanabe, Y.; Dynamic Control and Performance of a Unified Power Flow Controller for Stabilizing an AC Transmission System; IEEE Trans. Power Electron. Vol. 21, No. 4 July 2006.

L. Liu, P. Zhu, Y. Kang, and J. Chen, Powerflow control performance analysis of a unified powerflow controller in a novel control scheme, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2007.

Patrick W. Wheeler, JosÃ© RodrÃguez, Jon C. Clare, Lee Empringham, and Alejandro Weinstein Matrix Converters: A Technology Review IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 49, no. 2, 2002

N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS. Piscataway,NJ: IEEE Press, , 2001.