An Experimental Study of Counter flow Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger using CuO / Water Nanofluid

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS60385

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

An Experimental Study of Counter flow Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger using CuO / Water Nanofluid

1Mr. Vatsal. S. Patel 2Dr. Ragesh. G. Kapadia 3Dr. Dipak A. Deore

M.E.[Thermal Engg.] Student

Department of Mechanical Engineering, S.V.M. Institute of Technology, Bharuch Gujarat.

Professor and Principle , Department of Mechanical Engineering, S.V.M. Institute of Technology, Bharuch Gujarat.

Asst.Professor and HOD, Department of Chemical Engineering, S.V.M. Institute of Technology, Bharuch Gujarat.

Abstract

Nano fluid is a fluid having nano size particles, dispersed in the conventional base fluids such as water, engine oil, ethylene glycol, which tremendously enhances the heat transfer characteristics of original fluid. Because of this fluid containing suspensions of metallic nanoparticles and have higher thermal conductivity. In the present study, we have experimentally investigated effect of addition of 1 wt. % CuO nanoparicles in base cold fluid using counter flow concentric tube heat exchanger. The heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of the CuO Water nanofluid flowing in a counter flow concentric tube heat exchanger under turbulent flow conditions are investigated. The results show that the convective heat transfer coefficient of nanofluid is higher than that of the base liquid by about 3.45 9.5%. The heat transfer coefficient of the nanofluid increases with an increase in the mass flow rate of the hot water and nanofluid.

1. Introduction

Heat exchangers play an important part in the field of energy conservation, conversion and recovery. Several studies have focused on direct transfer type heat exchanger, where heat transfer between fluids occurs through a separating wall or into and out of a wall in a transient manner. There are two important phenomena happening in a heat exchanger: fluid flow in channels and heat transfer between fluids and channel walls.

Thus, improvements to heat exchangers can be achieved by improving the processes occurring

during those phenomena. Firstly the rate of heat transfer depends on the surface area to volume ratio, which means the smaller channel dimensions provide the better heat transfer coefficient. Secondly, improving the properties of the heat transfer fluids (nanofluids) can yield higher heat transfer coefficient in a heat exchanger. In recent years, modem technologies have permitted the manufacturing of particles down to the nanometer scale, which have created a new class of fluids, called nanofluid.

The application of nanofluids or fluids containing suspensions of metallic nanoparticles to confront heat transfer problems in thermal management is one of the technological uses of nanoparticles that hold enormous promise today. Experiments have shown that nanofluids have improved thermal conductivities when compared to the base fluids and enhancement in the heat transfer coefficient.

In the present study, we have fabricated concentric tube heat exchanger to investigate the thermal performance of heat exchanger using nanofluid. We also have synthesized the CuO nanoparticles. We have experimentally investigated effect of addition of 1 wt. % CuO nanoparicles in base cold fluid using counter flow concentric tube heat exchanger.

2. Experimental methods

2.1 Fabrication of Concentric tube Heat exchanger

The experimental set-up for measuring the convective heat transfer coefficient is shown schematically in Fig 2.1. It mainly consist of a concentric tube heat exchanger , hot and cold water circulation pumps, storage water tanks, heater, digital temperature indicator and flowmeters. Cold water flows through inner tube in one direction only and hot water flows in an annulus. Direction

of cold fluid flow can be changed from parallel or counter to hot water so that unit can be operated as parallel or counter flow heat exchanger. Flow rates of hot and cold water are measured using rotameters. A by-pass valve is used to reduce the load on the pump. A pump is used to circulate the hot water from a re-cycled type water tank, which is fitted with heater and thermostat.

The test section was a straight copper tube having a 9.35 mm inner diameter and while the outer tube is made from stainless steel and has a 33.5 mm inner diameter. The test section is thermally isolated from its upstream and downstream section by asbestos rope in order to reduce the heat loss along the axial direction. For measurement of the temperature of inlet and outlet condition , RTD/ PT

-100 sensors are used.

Figure – 2.1 : The schematic of experimental set- up

Measurements were carried out after 30 min when the system reached steady state at different mass flow rate of hot and cold fluid.

2.2 Synthesis of Nanoparticle

In this method , CuO nanoparticle is synthesized with a wet chemical method. It has the advantages in terms of controlling the particle size, reducing agglomeration of the nanoparticles , and producing nanofluids in a large scale. This method is a promising technique for commercial synthesis of nanofluids as shown in Fig.2 .

In a typical procedure [19], 2.395 gms of copper acetate [Cu(CH3COO)2 ] is dissolved in 60 ml of water and make solution of Copper acetate (Cu(CH3COO)2·H2O) then add 0.6 ml of glacial acetic acid. heat the reaction mixture upto 15 min. then add 3ml NaOH solution (0.96 gm NaOH in 3ml Water). The color of the solution turned from blue to black immediately, and a black suspension formed simultaneously. The obtained mixture boil for 2 hours. [19]

Figure 2.2. CuO nanoparticles using Wet chemical method

Then mixture was cooled to room temperature . Then, a wet CuO precipitate was obtained. The wet precipitate was washed twice with distilled water to remove the impurity ions. filter it with filter paper and dry the particles. Finally obtained particle is as shown in figure.

Table – 2.2. : Thermophysical properties of water

and nanoparticles

Obtain particles are dispersed in base fluid with help of surfactant (SDS – Sodium Dodecyle Sulphate) to make colloidal mixture.

Property

Water

Cu

Al2O3

CuO

TiO2

C (J / kg K)

4179

385

765

535.6

686.2

(kg / m3)

997.1

8933

3970

6310

4250

K (W / m K)

0.605

400

40

76.5

8.9538

Property

Water

Cu

Al2O3

CuO

TiO2

C (J / kg K)

4179

385

765

535.6

686.2

(kg / m3)

997.1

8933

3970

6310

4250

K (W / m K)

0.605

400

40

76.5

8.9538

2.3 Effect on the Thermophysical properties

of nanofluid

The density is calculated from Pak and Cho using the following equation:

nf = p + (1- ) w

where is the volume fraction of the nanoparticles, p is the density of the nanoparticles and w is the density of the base fluid.

Drew and Passman suggested the well-known Eintein equation for calculating the viscosity, which is applicable to spherical particles in volume fractions of less than 5.0 vol.% and is defined as follows:

nf = (1 + 2.5 ) w

where nf is the viscosity of the nanofluid and w is the viscosity of the base fluid.

The specific heat is calculated from Xuan and Roetzel as follows:

Moreover, the Pak and Cho and Xuan and Li correlations for predicting the Nusselt number for nanofluid are compared with the results which are defined as follows:

The Pak and Cho correlation is defined as: Nunf = 0.021

The Xuan and Li correlation is defined as:

Nunf = 0.0059 (1.0 + 7.6286

(Cp)nf

= (Cp)p + (1- )(Cp)w

0.6886 )

where (Cp)nf is the heat capacity of the nanofluid, (Cp)p is the heat capacity of the nanoparticles and (Cp)w is the heat capacity of the base fluid.

The thermal conductivity of the nanofluid is calculated from Yu and Choi using the following equation:

Knf = Kw

where knf is the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid, Kp is the thermal conductivity of the nanoparticles, Kw is the thermal conductivity of the base fluid and is the ratio of the nanolayer thickness to the original particle radius.

Thermal conductivities of two kinds of nanofluids, copper oxide distilled water and also alumina- distilled water, in temperature range of 20 °C to 50°C were studied. Results show an increase in the thermal conductivity coefficient by increasing the temperature and also particle concentrations. Thermal conductivity of nanofluids was also increased by increasing the thermal conductivity of particles.

Some new correlations were also suggested to measure the thermal conductivity of the nanofluids. [ 20 ]

Before starting to determine the convective heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of the nanofluid, the reliability and accuracy of the experimental system are estimated by using water as the working fluid.

The Reynolds number of the nanofluid is defined as:

Renf =

The Prandtl number of the nanofluid is defined as: Prnf =

The Peclet number of the nanofluid is defined as:

Penf =

where dp is the diameter of the nanoparticles.

In order to calculate the Peclet number, the thermal diffusivity of the nanofluid nf) is defined as:

nf =

From the above equations we can find the thermophysical properties of nanofluids.

There is a effect of particle volume concentration on thermophysical properties of nanofluid .Using the correlation of this properties for nanofluid we can see the effect on it.

      1. Effect on Density of nanofluid :

        Using Pak and Cho relation in figure 4.1 , it is concluded that if we increase the volume concentration of nanoparticles then increase in density of nanofluid.

        CuO + Water

        CuO + Water

        Cu + Water

        Cu + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water

        TiO2 + Water

        TiO2 + Water

        Cu + Water

        Cu + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water

        CuO + Water

        CuO + Water

        TiO2 + Water

        TiO2 + Water

        Knew [Yuan & Choi]

        Knew [Yuan & Choi]

        3600

        3400

        3200

        3000

        2800

        CuO + Water

        Cu + Water Al2 O3 + Water TiO2 + Water

        Cu + Water

        1.8 Al2 O3 + Water

        CuO + Water

        1.6 TiO2 + Water

        1.4

        2600

        2400

        1.2

        2200

        2000

        1

        1800

        0.8

        1600

        3600

        3400

        3200

        3000

        2800

        CuO + Water

        Cu + Water Al2 O3 + Water TiO2 + Water

        Cu + Water

        1.8 Al2 O3 + Water

        CuO + Water

        1.6 TiO2 + Water

        1.4

        2600

        2400

        1.2

        2200

        2000

        1

        1800

        0.8

        1600

        2

        nf

        nf

        1400

        1200

        1000

        0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

        Figure – 2.3.1 : Effect on density due to volume concentration

      2. Effect on Specific heat of nanofluid :

        Using Xuan and Roetzel correlation in figure 4.2 , it can concluded that there is a decrease in specific heat with increase in the volume fraction.

        CuO + Water

        CuO + Water

        CuO + Water

        Cu + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water TiO2 + Water

        CuO + Water

        Cu + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water TiO2 + Water

        4000

        Cu + Water

        Cu + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water

        Al2 O3 + Water

        3500

        TiO2 + Water

        TiO2 + Water

        3000

        Cnf

        Cnf

        2500

        2000

        1500

        1000

        0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

        Figure – 2.3.2 : Effect on Specific heat due to volume fraction

      3. Effect on Thermal conductivity of nanofluid :

Most important property is thermal conductivity, Using Yuan and Choi relation we observe that there is a enhancement in thermal conductivity with increase in volume concentration of nanoparticle in base fluid. A temperature dependent thermal conductivity model by S.Sh. Hosseini shows a better enhancement in thermal conductivity. It is a easy and economic method to determine it.

0.6

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Tnf = 35 [c] Tw = 53 [c]

CuO + Water

Al2 O3 + Water

Tnf = 35 [c] Tw = 53 [c]

CuO + Water

Al2 O3 + Water

1.25

CuO + Water

CuO + Water

Al2 O3 + Water

Al2 O3 + Water

[S.Sh.Hosseini , New method] [S.Sh.Hosseini , New method]

1.2

1.15

1.1

1.05

1

Knf

Knf

0.95

0.9

0.85

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Volume concentration

Figure – 2.3.3 : Effect on Thermal conductivity due to volume fraction

3 . Result and Discussion

The experiments were carried out by varying the mass flow rate of hot and cold fluid to investigate the effect of nanofluid on heat transfer coefficent. First, the test is carried out with Water / Water, then adding nanoparticles in base cold fluid by 1% wt.

1) Effect of mass flow rate of cold fluid on overall heat transfer coefficient :

As shown in fig. 3.1, the heat transfer coefficient increases with increases with increase in mass flow rate of cold fluid keeping constant hot water mass flow rate at 0.048 kg/s . The inlet temperature of hot water is 53.1 °C and Cold fluid is 35.2 °C. At this mass flow rate it is observed that there is a enhancement in heat transfer coefficient by addition of 1 % wt of nanoparticle. The approximate increase in heat transfer coefficient is found to be in range of 3.5% to 8.6%.

CuO[1% wt.] / Water

CuO[1% wt.] / Water

mh = 0.048 kg/s

CuO[1% wt.] / Water Water / Water

mh = 0.048 kg/s

CuO[1% wt.] / Water Water / Water

2000

Water / Water

Water / Water

1800

1600

Uo

Uo

1400

1200

1000

800

600

0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 0.022 0.024

mc

mh = 0.062 kg/s

CuO [1%wt.] / Water Water / Water

mh = 0.062 kg/s

CuO [1%wt.] / Water Water / Water

Figure – 3.1 : Comparison of heat transfer coefficient obtained from water and that from the 1% wt. of CuO nanoparicles dispersed in water.

2200

CuO [1%wt.] / Water

CuO [1%wt.] / Water

2000

Water / Water

Water / Water

1800

Uo

Uo

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 0.022 0.024

mc

35

NuD

NuD

NuP

NuP

NuX

NuX

NuP NuD NuX

NuP NuD NuX

30.5

NuD, NuP, NuX

NuD, NuP, NuX

26

21.5

17

12.5

1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000

Renf

Figure – 3.3 : Comparison of Nusselt number Vs Reynolds number using different correlation

From the experiment it is found that the Nusselt number increases with Reynolds number . Fig. 3.3 shows that the calculated values of Nusselt number using Pak and Cho correlation gives better agreement to the behaviour of nanofluid than the Dittus-Bolter and Xuan and Li correlation.

3) Effect of mass flow rate of cold fluid on convective heat transfer coefficient using different correlation :

hnP

hnP

hnP

hnD hnX

hnP

hnD hnX

3500

hnD

hnD

hnX

hnX

3050

hnD, hnP, hnX

hnD, hnP, hnX

2600

Figure – 3.2 : Comparison of heat transfer coefficient obtained from water and that from the 1% wt. of CuO nanoparticles dispersed in water.

As the hot water mass flow rate is increased from

0.048 kg/s to 0.062 kg/s, it is observed that there is a enhancement in heat transfer coefficient in the range approximately 6.42 % – 10 % shown in fig. 3.2.

2) Effect of Reynolds number on Nusselt number of nanofluid using different correlation:

2150

1700

1250

0.008 0.012 0.016 0.02 0.024 0.028 0.032

mnf

Figure – 3.4 : Effect of mass flow rate of nanofluid on convective heat transfer coefficient based on different correlation

As shown in Fig. 3.4, the convective heat transfer coefficient increases with increases in mass flow rate of nanofluid.

4) Effect of mass flow rate on effectiveness:

As shown in Fig. 3.5 , effectiveness is increases with increase in the mass flow rates of hot fluid and cold fluid.

mh = 0.048 kg/s mh = 0.062 kg/s

mh = 0.048 kg/s mh = 0.062 kg/s

0.56

mh = 0.048 kg/s

mh = 0.048 kg/s

0.54

mh = 0.062 kg/s

mh = 0.062 kg/s

0.52

Effectiveness

Effectiveness

0.5

0.48

0.46

0.44

0.42

0.4

0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 0.022 0.024

mnf [mass flow rate of cold fluid]

Figure – 3.5 : Effectiveness Vs mass flow rate of nanofluid

5) Friction factor :

Water CuO [1%wt] + Water

Water CuO [1%wt] + Water

0.014

Water

Water

CuO [1%wt] + Water

CuO [1%wt] + Water

0.0135

Friction factor

Friction factor

0.013

0.0125

0.012

0.0115

0.011

0.0105

1750 2200 2650 3100 3550 4000

Reynolds number

Figure – 3.6 : Comparison of friction factor for water and CuO/Water nanofluid

As shown in Fig. 3.6 , the friction factors of the nanofluid agree well with those of water data under the same Reynolds number at hot water flow rate is

0.048 kg/s. This may be because the small additional nanoparticles in the base liquid do not cause the change in the flow behaviour of the fluid. This means that the nanofluid will not cause a penalty drop in pressure and there is no need for additional pump power.

4. Conclusion

The convective heat transfer performance and flow characteristic of a CuO water nanofluid prepared by wet chemical method , flowing in a fabricated counter flow concentric tube heat exchanger is experimentally investigated.

Experiments are carried out to study the effects of the mass flow rate of the cold fluid as well as hot fluid on the heat transfer coefficient and flow characteristics.

The following conclusions have been obtained:

  • The use of CuO water nanofluid significantly gives higher heat transfer coefficients in the range approximately 3.45% – 9.5% than those of the pure base fluid. There is an enhancement in the heat transfer process because the suspended ultra-fine particles remarkably increase the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid.

  • Pak and Cho correlation for predicting the heat transfer coefficient of a nanofluid agreed better with the results of this experiment than the Xuan and Li correlation.

  • The convective heat transfer coefficient, overall heat transfer coefficient and effectiveness increases with an increasing Reynolds number and an increasing mass flow rate of the cold fluid and hot fluid.

  • The friction factor of the nanofluid are approximately the same as those of water in the given conditions. This implies that the nanofluid incurs no penalty of pump power and may be suitable for practical application.

5. References

  1. Gupta H.K, Agrawal G.D, Mathur J, "An overview of nanofluids: A new media towards Green environment ", IJES ,Volume 3, No 1, 2012 .

  2. Weerapun Duangthongsuk, Somchai Wongwises, "Heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop characteristics of Tio2Water nanofluid in a double-tube counter flow heat exchanger", International journal of heat and mass transfer , 52 (2009) , 20592067.

  3. Yimin Xuan, Qiang Li, "Heat transfer enhancement of nanofuids", International journal of heat and fluid flow

    , 21 (2000) , 58-64 .

  4. Parham Naderia, A.Moharrerib, H.Goshayshic, "An experimental study on the heat transfer performance of sio2-water nanofluid in a double pipe heat exchanger".

  5. Anchupogu.Praveen, Penugonda Suresh Babu, Venkata Ramesh Mamilla, "Analysis on heat transfer in nanofluids for Al2o3 / Water" , International journal of advanced scientific research and technology, Volume 2 (April 2012) .

  6. Om Shankar Prajapati, "Effect of Al2O3-Water nanofluids in convective heat transfer", International journal of nanoscience ,Vol. No. 1 (2012) , 1-4.

  7. Amirhossein Zamzamian , Shahin Nasseri Oskouie, Ahmad Doosthoseini , Aliakbar Joneidi , Mohammad Pazouki ,"Experimental investigation of forced convective heat transfer coefficient in nanofluids of Al2O3/EG and CuO/EG in a double pipe and plate heat exchangers under turbulent flow", Experimental thermal and fluid science , 35 (2011) , 495502.

  8. Masoud Haghshenas Fard , Mohammad Reza Talaie B, And Somaye Nasr, " Numerical and experimental investigation of heat transfer of ZnO / Water nanofluid in the concentric tube", Thermal science, Year 2011, Vol. 15, No. 1, 183-194.

  9. N. Bozorgan , "Evaluation of using Al2O3 / EG and TiO2 / EG nanofluids as coolants in the double-tube heat exchanger" Advanced design and manufacturing technology, Vol. 5/ No. 2/ March – 2012 .

  10. Sarit Kumar Das, Stephen U. S. Choi, "Heat transfer in nanofluids A review", Heat transfer engineering, 27(10) , 319, 2006 .

  11. P. C. Mukesh Kumar, J. Kumar, "Heat transfer and friction factor studies in helically coiled tube using Al2O3

    / Water nanofluid", European journal of scientific

    research, ISSN 1450-216x , Vol.82 , No.2 (2012), 161- 172.

  12. S. M. Sohel Murshed, Kai Choong Leong, Chun Yang And Nam-Trung Nguyen "Convective heat transfer characteristics of aqueous Tio2 nanofluid under laminar flow conditions" .

  13. L. Syam Sundar, K.V. Sharma, "Laminar convective heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 nanofluid in circular tube fitted with twisted tape inserts", International journal of automotive and mechanical engineering (IJAME) ,ISSN: 1985-9325 , Volume 3, 265-278, January-June 2011.

  14. Yimin Xua, Qiang Li , "Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of nanofluids", Journal of heat transfer , 2002.

  15. Yurong He, Yi Jin , Haisheng Chen , Yulong Ding , Daqiang Cang , Huilin Lu. " Heat transfer and flow behaviour of aqueous suspensions of TiO2 nanoparticles (nanofluids) flowing upward through a vertical pipe " . International journal of heat and mass transfer , 50 (2007) , 22722281.

  16. Chandrasekar Murugesan, Senthilkumar Tamilkolundu," Mechanism of forced convective heat transfer in Al2O3 / Water nanofluid under laminar and turbulent flow", International conference on chemical, ecology and environmental sciences (ICCEES'2012) Singapore, April 28-29, 2012.

  17. Sadollah Ebrahimi, Anwar Gavili, Maryamalsadat Lajevardi ," New class of coolants: nanofluids".

  18. P. Sivashanmugam, "Application of nanofluids in heat transfer".

  19. Haitao Zhu, Dongxiao Han, Zhaoguo Meng, Daxiong Wu, Canying Zhang , "Preparation and thermal conductivity of CuO nanofluid via a wet chemical method", Nanoscale Research letters – Springer Open Journal , 2011.

  20. S.Sh. Hosseini, N.M. Adam, B.Z.Azmi, A. Ahmadi,

A. Shahrjerdi , "Measuring Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluid by New Method " , Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9): 985-996, ISSN 1991- 8178 ,2011

Leave a Reply