- Open Access
- Authors : S. T. Aly , Amal M. El-Sayed , Kareem M. Tharwat, Mahmoud A. Mahmoud , Ahmed M. Khaled, Ahmed M. Gad, Ahmed T. Mahmoud
- Paper ID : IJERTV8IS120034
- Volume & Issue : Volume 08, Issue 12 (December 2019)
- Published (First Online): 11-12-2019
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Adsorption of Nile Blue Dye using Guava Leaf Powder
S. T. Aly*, Amal M. El-Sayed, Kareem M. Tharwat, Mahmoud A. Mahmoud, Ahmed M. Khaled, Ahmed M. Gad, Ahmed T. Mahmoud
Department of Chemical Engineering,
Egyptian Academy for Engineering and Advanced Technology, Egypt
Abstract Batch sorption experiments were carried out using two types of adsorbents; guava leaf powder (GLP) and activated carbon (AC) for the removal of Nile blue dye from aqueous solutions (100 ppm). Different adsorbent dosages were applied 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2g. The concentration of dye solutions was measured with time using ultraviolet spectrophotometer. Adsorption isotherms were applied to the experimental data to test the best fitting. Freundlich isotherm was the best fitting in case of AC and Langmuir isotherm is the best fitting in case of GLP. The maximum uptake of dye for AC was 4.997mg/g with adsorption efficiency 27.65% (0.5 g, 100 rpm, 30 min) and for GLP, 14.85 mg/g with adsorption efficiency 74.25% (0.5g, 100rpm, 30min) which mean the GLP is more efficient than AC. The effect of dye concentration (25, 50, 75, 100 ppm) was studied by fixing all other parameters, it was noticed the improvement in adsorption efficiency with increasing dye concentration. Also the effect of temperature was studied and little improvement was noticed. Two kinetics models were tested and Pseudo first order is the best in case of Ac and Pseudo second order model was the best in case of GLP.
Dyes are the colored materials that applied to textiles and other products, such as leather, cosmetics, pulp and paper, pharmaceuticals, plastics and food to change their appearance [1 – 6]. In the past; they were produced naturally from plants, animals and insects, but the produced amount become inappropriate with the rapid growth of population and their needs, so scientists tried to generate dyes synthetically using chemicals . The generation of synthetic dyes allows the global production to increase up to 700,000 tons/year of 100,000 different types of dyes [1, 3, 4].
On the other hand; dying is a water intensive industry, where huge amount of water is used, so a huge amount of wastewater is produced  which contains about 2% of the annual production of dyes [1, 3]. It should be treated before disposal, but the dye is still noticeable even at very low concentrations (less than 1 ppm) which is undesirable . The presence of dyes in wastewater is considered carcinogenic for human  besides affecting the aquatic life as dyes prevent penetration of light which damage the biological processes which is performed by the living organisms [1, 3, 10, 11].
The main problem in the disposal of the wastewater from dying process is that dyes are chemicals with complex structure , so the ordinary biological treatment is not sufficient for the removal of colors from water . Also the application of the wastewater treatment methods such as flocculation, chemical coagulation, precipitation and membrane filtration is not considered the optimum solution, because these methods produce hazardous byproducts and require high cost and energy [4, 14, 15]. So most treatment plants are forced to apply the adsorption technique using various adsorbents to reach their goal. The most commonly used adsorbent is activated carbon due to its high adsorption capacity, availability and non-toxicity, but it is expensive for large scale treatment, so regeneration should be performed . For this reason, the agricultural adsorbents appear as alternatives, as they are available and may be used once through without affecting the environment [12, 16].
In this study different doses of both activated carbon and guava leaf powder (GLP) are applied to calculate their adsorption capacity of Nile blue dye. Different parameters are studied, by changing the dye concentration, residence time and temperature to know the best conditions at which guava leaf powder may be used as an adsorbent for this dye.
Nile blue dye, activated carbon, guava leaf powder and distillate water.
Ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer (UV)(EV3122906), dryer, mechanical shaker, digital balance, heater, and mixer.
The ultraviolet spectrophotometer device is used to determine the adsorption capacity of both activated carbon and guava leaf powder. So a synthetic wastewater mother liquor is formed by dissolving 1 g of Nile blue dye in one liter distillate water. At first; a sample of this wastewater is scanned using UV to determine the maximum wavelength of this dye.
Calibration curve is plotted, by preparation of different concentrations of dye solutions from 1 10ppm. The absorbance of light is obtained for each concentration using UV. Then the calibration curve is plotted between the absorbance and concentration.
The effects of dose, concentration, time and temperature are examined, so batch adsorption is performed. As a first step; guava leaf powder is prepared by washing guava leaf using tap water then distillate water. After washing they are dried at 60C to get rid of the moisture content, then grinding
is performed to increase the adsorption surface area. The powder is used as such without further treatment. Then different doses of activated carbon and guava leaf powder are taken to be able to determine the most effective dose for a constant concentration which is 100 ppm at 100 rpm and 20C, so 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 g of adsorbents are applied and samples are taken every 10 minutes to check the performance of the adsorbent.
Different parameters are studied, effect of adsorbent dose (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2) g/100ml of dye solution, effect of dye
concentration (25, 50, 75, 100) ppm, effect of temperature 20, 40, and 60C. At all parameters the concentration is measured with constant time intervals (10min) up to reaching equilibrium concentration.
After performing the previous experiments, the efficiency of removal of dye should be calculated using equation (1) to determine the optimum conditions for each adsorbent and to determine the most suitable adsorbent among these two adsorbents for removal of Nile blue dye.
Removal efficiency = ((Co Ce)/Co)*100 (1)
So two different adsorption isotherms are developed for homogeneous and heterogeneous energy distribution on the adsorption surface which are Langmuir and Freundlich respectively . For Freundlich isotherm the following equation is applied:
qe = Kf. (Ce)1/n (2)
Where, qe is the mass of dye adsorbed in mg per one g of adsorbent, Ce is the concentration of dye in the solution at equilibrium in ppm, Kf is the adsorption capacity constant, and n is the adsorption intensity constant. But to get these constants, the pervious form should be linearized to be:
Log(qe)= log Kf + (1/n) logCe (3) While for Langmuir isotherm the original equation is:
qe = (abCe)/(1+bCe) (4)
and its linearized form becomes:
1/qe =1/(abCe)+ 1/a (5)
Where, a and b are constants indicate the nature of adsorption. These two isotherms are drawn and the R2 is determined, so the graph which results higher R2 is considered the acceptable one and from which the constants are obtained.
The adsorption kinetics is a line or curve describes the rate of adsorption or desorption of a solute from the solid surface of adsorbent. It may follow the pseudo first order or the pseudo second order according to the heterogeneity of the solid surface with respect to the solute [6, 17]. The equations of both pseudo first and second order models areexpressed as follows:
The pseudo first order model:
Log(qe qt) = Log(qe) (K.t)/2.303 (6) The pseudo second order model:
t/qt = (1/qe) x t + 1/( K.qe2 ) (7)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Its found that the maximum wavelength of Nile blue dye is 630 nm, so the solutions with concentrations in the range of 1 10 ppm are exposed to light with that wavelength to be able to plot the calibration curve as illustrated in fig. 1.
The most effictive dose at 100 rpm and 20C is found to
Fig. 1: The calibration curve
The most effective dose at 100 rpm and 20C is found to be 0.5g of both activated carbon and guava leaf powder using 100 ml of 100ppm solution. Then the concentration of dye is changed by applying the optimum dose which is 0.5 g adsorbent, at the same conditions (100 rpm and 20C) to be 25, 50, 75, and 100 ppm. Samples are taken as time proceeds until reaching the equilibrium to calculate the adsorption capacity at equilibrium. The results from this experiment are represented using the Freundlich and Langmuir models. From these data; the adsorption isotherms are plotted but it is found that activated carbon fits Freundlich isotherm while GLP fits the Langmuir isotherm as shown in fig. 2. From this graph, the value of a and b are 17.6 and 11.852 respectively.
Fig. 2: Langmuir adsorption isotherm for guava leaf powder
To determine the most suitable adsorbent, the maximum adsorption capacity is calculated for both activated carbon and guava leaf powder at equilibrium (after 30min) and found to be 4.997mg/g and 14.85 mg/g respectively. Also the efficiency of removal of dye is calculated in both cases and their values are 27.65% for activated carbon and 74.25% for
guava leaf powder. From the previous results; it is clear that guava leaf powder is more effective than activated carbon, so the rest of experiments are done using GLP only.
Effect of Time
Fig. 3 illustrates the equilibrium time, and from which it is obvious that after equilibrium when time increases, desorption occurs, so the concentration increases again.
Fig. 3: The change in concentration of dye with time
Effect of Dye concentration
It was noticed that as concentration of dye increased from 25- 100 ppm the adsorption capacity (qe) increased from 4.2mg/g to 14.85 mg/g.
Effect of Temperature
Fig. 4 shows that as temperature increases, the adsorption power of Nile blue dye increases slightly.
Fig. 5: The pseudo second order model
Guava leaf powder and activated carbon can be used for adsorption of Nile blue dye
Guava leaf powder is cheaper than activated carbon and more efficient.
Adsorption efficiency of activated carbon is 27.65 % and 74.25% for guava leaf powder
Increasing the temperature from 20-60oC slightly improved the adsorption efficiency of guava leaf
Increasing the concentration of dye from 25-100ppm improved the adsorption capacity of guava leaf from 4.2mg/g to 14.85 mg/g.
Langmuir adsorption isotherm was the best fitting for guava leaf powder
The pseudo second order model was the best fitting for kinetics of adsorption using guava leaf powder.
Special thanks to the Egyptian Academy for Engineering and Advanced Technology for their support and providing us with the required materials and devices that required for performing the experimental work, and many thanks for our supervisors who dedicated their time and effort to support us technically.
Fig. 4: The effect of temperature on the adsorption power
The adsorption kinetics of dye over the surface of guava leaf powder is represented in fig.5; it was found that the adsorption process of Nile blue dye over the surface of guava leaf powder is compatible with the pseudo second order model.
S. Benkhaya, and A. Elharfi "Classifications, properties and applications of textile dyes: A review," Environmental Engineering science, pp. 311-320, 2017.
D. Mazumder, "Process evaluation and treatability study of wastewater in a textile dyeing industry," Energy and Environment, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1053-1066, 2011.
R. Gandhimathi, S. Ramesh, T. Elavarasi, R. Thamizh, K. Sowmya, and P. Nidheesh "Comparison of methaylene blue adsorption form aqueous solution using spent tea dust and raw coir pith," Global Nest, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 146-159, 2014.
T. Banu, and G. GÃ¼Ã§lÃ¼, "Removal of basic dyes from aqueous solutions using natural clay," Elsevier, p. 13771379, 2009.
G. Lakshmi and V. Mahanti, "Removal of Dyes by Using Low Cost Adsorbents Agricultural Wastes and Sand," International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 3, no. 1, 2014.
V. Ponnusami, S. Vikram, and S. Srivastava "Guava (Psidium guajava) leaf powder: Novel adsorbent for removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions," Journal of Hazardous Materials, July 2007.
I. Chaari, E. Fakhfakh, M. Medhioub, and F. Jamoussi "Comparative study on adsorption of cationic and anionic dyes by smectite rich natural clays," Molecular Structure, 2018.
T. Nayara, S. Maria, M. Gurgel, and D. Barros "Adsorption of basic dyes onto activated carbon: Experimental and theoretical investigation of chemical reactivity," Applied Surface Science, 2018.
K. Mojsov1, D. Andronikov, A. Janevski1, A. Kuzelov, and S. Gaber "the application of enzymes for the removal of dyes from textile effluents," Advanced technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 36-41, 2016.
D. Meghavathu, G. Kumari, and M. Vangalapati "Equilibrium and Kinetic Modelling of Methylene Blue Adsorption by Psidium Guajava," International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 11, November 2017.
T. yim, and G. GÃ¼Ã§lÃ¼, "Removal of basic dyes from aqueous solutions using natural clay," Desalination, vol. 249, p. 13771379, 2009.
P. Malik, "Dye removal from wastewater using activated carbon developed from sawdust: adsorption equilibrium and kinetics," Hazardous materials, p. 8188, 2004.
K. Lekha, G. Vasumathi, R. Neelam, and A. Archna, "Textile Dye Removal Using Pelletized Agro waste," Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 83-90, 2014.
A. Molla, Y. Li, B. Mandal, S. Kang, S. Hyun, and J. Chung, "Selective Adsorption of Organic Dyes on Graphene Oxide: Theoretical and Experimental Analysis," Applied surface science, 2018.
M. Sulyman, J. Namiesnik1, and A. Gierak "Low-cost Adsorbents Derived from Agricultural By-products/Wastes for Enhancing Contaminant Uptakes from Wastewater: A Review," Environmental studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 479-510, 2017.
S. Bharathi, and S. Ramesh "Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: A review," Applied water science, p. 773790, 2013.
G. William, S. Emik, A. Ã–ngen, H. Kurtulus, and S. Aydin "Advanced Sorption Process Application", 2019.