A Brief Overview of Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Uses

A Brief Overview of Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Uses

Ravinder Singh 1,,Simranjit Singh Sidhu 1*Sandeep Singh 1 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Punjabi University Patiala, Punjab, India

1*Corresponding author email: simranjit_me@pbi.ac.in

ABSTRACT

In the treatment of critical-sized bone defects, calcium phosphates (CaPs), biocompatible and recyclable materials, have attracted a lot of attention for bone regeneration. They show potential as an alternative to allografts and autografts. One of the main reasons for their usefulness is their close similarity to the mineral component of genuine bone. Since hydroxyapatite (HA) is the main inorganic phase of bone tissue, it is particularly significant among the several CaPs. With a focus on fabrication methods and their impact on the mechanical characteristics of the final structures, this paper offers a thorough summary of both historical and contemporary advancements in the use of HA as a bone graft material. Material processing advancements have made it possible to produce HA-based grafts in a variety of shapes, meeting the needs of many clinical applications and producing promising results in both in vitro and in vivo investigations. Additionally, the increasing focus on developing three-dimensional porous grafts that approximate the trabecular structure of bone has created new challenges, particularly in acquiring mechanical properties suitable for potential use in load- bearing sites.

Keywords

Hydroxyapatite (HA), Allografts, Autografts, In vitro,In Vivo, calcium phosphates.

INTRODUCTION

Calcium phosphates (CaPs) have been of interest to the scientific community since the early 1900s

as materials for the creation of bone replacements in biomedical applications. The first investigation was conducted in 1920 when CaPs were utilized as a filler to heal rabbits' critical-size bone fractures[1]. Due to their osteogenic potential in vitro and in vivo, as well as their physico- mechanical characteristics that resemble those of human bone[2].

CaPs are now widely used in several medical specialties, including otolaryngology, orthopedics, skull and maxillofacial reconstruction, spine surgery, treatment of osseous fractures and bone diseases, percutaneous implants, and dentistry/periodontal surgery[3]. According to an American study, around 1.3 billion dollars were spent solely on CaP-based bone substitutes in 2010[4]. The primary components of bone (~60 wt%) and dental enamel (~90 wt%) are CaPs[5]. and this is the primary reason for their research in bone regeneration and repair.

Their chemical characteristics and crystalline structure are very comparable to those of bone apatite[6] and outstanding biocompatibility with living cells[7,8]. It is generally established that CaPs, in any form (e.g., coating, powder, bulk, or porous scaffolds), have osteoconductive qualities that allow bone cells to adhere, proliferate, and migrate. It has also been observed that soluble and/or nano-sized CaPs have osteoinductive qualities, actively encouraging the development and regeneration of new bone[9,10].

The majority of CaPs can partially dissolve in bodily fluids while they are permanently present

in the human body. The supersaturation of the biological environment and resulting formation of apatite nanocrystals on the material surface are determined by the local increase in Ca2+ and PO43 ions at the bone/implant interface[11]. The rate at which the surface apatite layer forms depends on the type of bioceramic used; hydroxyapatite takes 30 days, whereas – tricalcium phosphate takes about 14 days[12]. Bioactive glasses, which react quickly with biological fluids, can generate a surface apatite layer within hours to days[13].

The time scale of response in vitro and in vivo clearly determines the difference between osteoconductive and osteoinductive biomaterials. Because of this, highly reactive materials like soluble CaPs or bioactive glasses are categorized to be in the latter group, However, a classic example of the former is non-porous hydroxyapatite, which has virtually little solubility[14].

Qui and Ducheyne have used an 11-step sequence to characterize the general responses that take place at the interface between CaPs and the biological environment[11].

1. Dissolution of CaPs

2. Precipitation from the solution on the surface of CaPs

3. Ion transfer and structural adjustment at the tissue/CaP interface

4. Dispersion from the boundary surface layer in the CaPs

5. Effects mediated by the solution on cell activity

6. Organic and mineral phase deposition without integration into the CaP surface

7. Deposition with integration of CaPs into the surface

8. Chemotaxis to the surface of CaPs

9. Cells attachment and proliferation

10. Differentiation of cells

11. ECM formation

In addition, CaPs are effective carriers of growth factors, bioactive peptides, and different cell types[4]. They affect the expression of osteoblastic differentiation markers such collagen type I (COL1), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and help in the development of mesenchymal stem cells[3]. Growth factors from the surrounding fluids can be stored in the intrinsic micropores of CaP materials, which are created by sintering powders[15].

Osteoinduction is heavily influenced not just by porosity, which may accelerate solubility and stimulate interactions with cells and biomolecules. Other factors to consider are composition, crystallinity (more crystallinity means slower degradation), and surface area (granular product vs. bulk blocks). Higher degradation rates usually result in higher osteoinductivepotential[11].CaPs can be made more osteoinductive by including specific signaling molecules (extrinsic osteoinductivity) or by optimizing the material's chemical and structural properties.

Other factors that affect osteoinduction include composition, degree of crystallinity (high crystallinity indicates low degradation rates), and surface area in general (granular product vs. bulk blocks, for example). Porosity can also speed up solubility and encourage interactions with cells and biomolecules[16].

Better osteoinductive potential is usually associated with higher degradation rates[11].CaPs'osteoinductivity is sometimes enhanced by introducing specific osteoinductive molecules that signal (extrinsic osteoinductivity) or by optimizing the material's structure and/or chemistry (intrinsic osteoinductivity)[17].

The varied Ca/P ratios of the different kinds of CaPs result in distinct releases of calcium and phosphate ions, which are essential for bone mineralization[3,6,18].

Changes in pH affect the chemical stability of CaPs in accordance with dissolving rate, and this can be controlled during the material's synthesis stage by adjusting the temperature, solvent type, pressure, and kind of precursors utilized[19].

A "technological" approach to dissolving control involves adjusting the sintering temperature in order to modulate the accessible surface area. The specific surface area will rise in tandem with the remaining inter-particle microporosity when the sintering temperature of CaPs is lowered. On the other hand, increasing the sintering temperature causes te micropores' volume and size to decrease, which lowers the specific surface area[11].

Because CaPs show a physical similarity to the mineral phase of bone, they have certain drawbacks, such as the absence of an organic phase (collagen, for example), which can be somewhat addressed by the creation of composites[20], They are unsatisfactory for load-bearing prosthetic applications, where harder metallic implants are usually used, because to their low mechanical strength and excessive brittleness.

Grain size determines strength in dense bioceramics; the smaller the crystals, the more durable the ceramic. Furthermore, when the crystalline phase grows and porosity reduces,

the mechanical characteristics improve. CaPs will exhibit higher compressive and tensile strength as well as fracture toughness if the crystalline phase occurs over the amorphous component[4,10].

According to an estimation, it suggests to utilize 70% coarse powders and 30% fine powders to obtain maximum packing and minimal shrinkage after sintering, which would result in increased mechanical strength[4].

CaPs are brittle polycrystalline materials that closely depend on composition, crystallinity, grain size, and porosity. These mechanical properties are linked to solubility both in vitro and in vivo. The creation of multiphasic CaP compounds is a method for effectively modifying the mechanical characteristics of CaPs. Using this method, homogenous mixtures of two (biphasic), three (triphasic), or more (multiphasic) single phases of CaPs with varying solubility are prepared.

The primary CaPs utilized in biomedical applications are listed in Table 1 along with their key attributes. The solubility and dissolution rate of the most widely utilized CaPs are as follows: -TCP > -TCP > HA > FA.

Table 1. Existing CaPs and their key characteristics, taken from [4].

a It is impossible for these substances to precipitate out of aqueous solutions. b It is impossible to test ACP's solubility exactly. Nevertheless, as stated in [6], log(Ks) values of

25.7 ± 0.1 (pH = 7.40), 29.9 ± 0.1 (pH = 6.00),

and 32.7 ± 0.1 (pH = 5.28) were found. In an acidic buffer, the relative degree of dissolution is ACP >> -TCP >> -TCP >> HA > FA [6].

Under some experimental circumstances, c A Ca/P ratio less than 1 was reported.

CONCLUSION

Calcium phosphatesparticularly hydroxyapatite (HA)have emerged as highly promising materials for bone regeneration due to their close chemical and structural resemblance to the mineral phase of natural bone. Their excellent biocompatibility, osteoconductive properties, and potential osteoinductivebehavior make them suitable alternatives to conventional autografts and allografts in various biomedical applications.Advancements in material synthesis, processing techniques, and scaffold fabrication have enabled the development of HA-based grafts with controlled porosity, crystallinity, and mechanical strength. These improvements have significantly enhanced their in vitro and in vivo

performance. However, limitations such as brittleness and low load-bearing capacity remain challenges, particularly for applications in high- stress environments.Future research should focus on optimizing multiphasic compositions, composite materials, and three-dimensional porous architectures to better mimic natural bone structure while improving mechanical reliability. With continued innovation, hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials are expected to play an increasingly vital role in orthopedic, dental, and reconstructive treatments.

REFERENCES

1. Albee, F.H., 1920. Studies in bone growth: triple calcium phosphate as a stimulus to osteogenesis. Annals of surgery, 71(1), p.32.

2. Jazayeri, H.E., Rodriguez-Romero, M., Razavi, M., Tahriri, M., Ganjawalla, K., Rasoulianboroujeni, M., Malekoshoaraie, M.H., Khoshroo, K. and Tayebi, L., 2018. The cross-disciplinary emergence of 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds in orthopedic bioengineering. Ceramics International, 44(1), pp.1-9.

3. Jeong, J., Kim, J.H., Shim, J.H., Hwang, N.S. and Heo, C.Y., 2019. Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration. Biomaterials research, 23(1), p.4.

4. Dorozhkin, S.V., 2015. Calcium orthophosphate bioceramics. Ceramics International, 41(10), pp.13913- 13966.

5. Eliaz, N. and Metoki, N., 2017. Calcium phosphate bioceramics: a review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials, 10(4), p.334.

6. Dorozhkin, S.V., 2010. Calcium orthophosphates as bioceramics: state of the art. Journal of functional biomaterials, 1(1), pp.22-107.

7. Dorozhkin, S.V., 2016. Multiphasic calcium orthophosphate (CaPO4) bioceramics and their biomedical applications. Ceramics International, 42(6), pp.6529-6554.

8. De Carvalho, B., Rompen, E., Lecloux, G., Schupbach, P., Dory, E., Art, J.F. and Lambert, F., 2019. Effect of sintering on in vivo biological performance of chemically deproteinized bovine hydroxyapatite. Materials, 12(23), p.3946.

9. Mohamad Yunos, D., Bretcanu, O. and Boccaccini, A.R., 2008. Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. Journal of Materials Science, 43(13), pp.4433-4442.

10. Rezwan, K., Chen, Q.Z., Blaker, J.J. and Boccaccini, A.R., 2006. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 27(18), pp.3413-3431.

11. Rh. Owen, G., Dard, M. and Larjava, H., 2018. Hydoxyapatite/etatricalcium phosphate biphasic ceramics as regenerative material for the repair of complex bone defects. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 106(6), pp.2493-2512.

12. Søballe, K., 1993. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation: mechanical and histological studies in

    dogs. ActaOrthopaedicaScandinavica, 64(sup255), pp.1-58.

13. Fiume, E., Barberi, J., Verné, E. and Baino, F., 2018. Bioactive glasses: from parent 45S5 composition to scaffold-assisted tissue-healing therapies. Journal of functional biomaterials, 9(1), p.24.

14. Cao, W. and Hench, L.L., 1996. Bioactive materials. Ceramics international, 22(6), pp.493-507.

15. Horowitz, R.A., Mazor, Z., Foitzik, C., Prasad, H., Rohrer, M. and Palti, A., 2010. β-tricalcium phosphate as bone substitute material: properties and clinical applications. Journal of Osseointegration, 2(2), pp.61- 68.

16. Islam, M.T., Felfel, R.M., Abou Neel, E.A., Grant, D.M., Ahmed, I. and Hossain, K.M.Z., 2017. Bioactive calcium phosphatebased glasses and ceramics and their biomedical applications: A review. Journal of tissue engineering, 8, p.2041731417719170.

17. Ebrahimi, M., Botelho, M.G. and Dorozhkin, S.V., 2017. Biphasic calcium phosphates bioceramics (HA/TCP): Concept, physicochemical properties and the impact of standardization of study protocols in biomaterials research. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 71, pp.1293-1312.

18. Habraken, W.J., Tao, J., Brylka, L.J., Friedrich, H., Bertinetti, L., Schenk, A.S., Verch, A., Dmitrovic, V., Bomans, P.H., Frederik, P.M. and Laven, J., 2013. Ion- association complexes unite classical and non-classical theories for the biomimetic nucleation of calcium phosphate. Nature communications, 4(1), p.1507.