Data Transmission in Internet of Things Networks with Minimal Energy Consumption

Data Transmission in Internet of Things Networks with Minimal Energy Consumption

Md. Khalid Mahbub Khan Department of Computer Science and Engineering East West University Dhaka, Bangladesh

khalidmahbub.khan@yahoo.com

Sumit Kumer Das Department of Computer Science and Engineering East West University Dhaka, Bangladesh

sumitkumerdas077@gmail.com

Saud Bin Alam Titumir Department of Computer Science and Engineering East West University Dhaka, Bangladesh

titumir.official24@gmail.com

AbstractThe Internet of Things (IoT) revolution has yielded significant advancements in data transmission, facilitating diverse applications in several sectors such as smart cities, healthcare, agriculture, and industrial automation. A primary concern is energy consumption as IoT networks expand. With the proliferation of battery-operated and resource-constrained devices, optimizing energy usage is crucial for prolonging the lifespan of these devices and ensuring the sustainability of IoT systems. The objective is to deliver a thorough review of energy-efficient data transfer mechanisms, encompassing a study of the underlying techniques such as duty cycle, data aggregation, edge computing, and adaptive data rates. Additionally, other developing themes are noted, like AI-driven optimization, sustainable IoT projects, and blockchain integration, alongside these established methodologies. These solutions possess the capacity to diminish energy usage while maintaining the performance and scalability of IoT networks. This research delineates the existing obstacles and prospects for enhancing energy efficiency using a rigorous literature analysis, simulated analyses, and practical case studies. This analysis aims to guide academics, developers, and regulators towards sustainable IoT ecosystems by highlighting the deficiencies of current methodologies and proposing potential alternatives. This comprehensive evaluation encapsulates critical facts and prospective solutions about the alleviation of energy-efficiency constraints to facilitate sustainable and scalable advancement of resource-constrained IoE sectors in the first phase of next- generation information civilization.

KeywordsIoT Networks; Energy Efficiency; Data Communication; Edge Computing; Blockchain; AI Optimization

1. INTRODUCTION

   The Internet of Things (IoT) represents a significant advancement in technology, crucial for advancements in areas such as smart cities, healthcare, agriculture, and transportation. With the proliferation of IoT applications, billions of interconnected devices are anticipated to be deployed in the next years, poised to transform our interaction with technology. However, the rapid expansion of IoT networks necessitates the assurance of energy efficiency inside the systems. Battery-powered devices, deployed in remote and inaccessible areas, require optimization to enhance battery longevity and performance stability. IoT networks also consume energy at the system level, encompassing network infrastructure (such as devices, routers, and switches) and the processing of extensive data in data centers. This indicates novel strategies for energy

   management due to the utilization of battery-operated sensors and actuators. The deployment of IoT systems in essential domains like smart cities, where devices support important infrastructure such as traffic control and public safety, requires dependable and energy-efficient solutions. Wearable gadgets and remote monitoring systems in healthcare applications depend significantly on efficient energy usage to sustain continuous operation. The situation is analogous in agriculture, where IoT devices employed for precision farming must operate in off-grid places with inadequate power supplies. The many applications underscore the necessity of tackling energy consumption issues within IoT networks. Effective data transmission in IoT networks is crucial for the long-term sustainability of these networks, minimizing operating time and expenses, and facilitating sustainable technical solutions. This study examines potential strategies for improving energy consumption in IoT networks at both hardware and software levels. We will examine critical approaches such as duty cycling, data aggregation, edge computing, and adaptive data rate modulation. Additionally, we will explore advanced trends such AI-driven optimization, blockchain integration, and sustainable IoT projects, emphasizing their potential to transform energy efficiency through extensive enhancements. This study facilitates the systematic attainment of energy efficiency in the IoT age by integrating conventional tactics with cutting-edge technology. As the IoT environment evolves, energy efficiency must transition from a technological issue to a component of the green agenda. This complex task necessitates the equilibrium of energy management, device efficiency, and system scalability, requiring methodologies that encompass engineering, computer science, and environmental research. Enable stakeholders to utilize the capabilities of energy- efficient IoT networks for a sustainable future.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

   This research introduces an Adaptive Method for Data Reduction (AMDR) aimed at minimizing data transmission in IoT networks, hence decreasing energy consumption and prolonging network longevity. AMDR reconstructs original data with user-specified precision, attaining a communication reduction of up to 95%. When integrated with LEACH, it improves efficiency in battery-operated IoT applications [1].

   The research introduces a Distributed Energy-efficient Data Reduction (DEDaR) methodology for IoT networks, employing AutoRegressive Prediction (ARP) to reduce data transmission. It integrates adaptive compression methodologies (APCA, SAX, and Huffman Encoding) to eradicate excess. Models demonstrate enhanced data reduction, improved energy use, and superior accuracy relative to current methodologies [2].

   This research presents a data transmission model for IoT networks, determining the subsequent forwarding node based on power levels and workload to improve the network's reliability. Simulation outcomes indicate enhanced node durability and diminished packet loss, improving energy use and prolonging operational duration in multi-hop data transmission contexts [3].

   5G networks will interlink extensive IoT ecosystems; yet, LTE-A's substantial data requirements impede effective small-packet transfer. Excessive energy consumption also constrains widespread IoT implementation. A suggested D2D-based methodology designates a data aggregator, optimizing Modulation and Coding Schemes (MCS) to improve resource usage and environmental sustainability in Smart City implementations [4].

   The amalgamation of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and the Internet of Things (IoT) augments sectors such as agriculture and smart healthcare, however encounters obstacles related to energy consumption and scalability. This study introduces EEDC, an energy-efficient routing protocol utilizing Region-Based Hierarchical Clustering (RHCER) to enhance communication, equilibrate load, and prolong network longevity, achieving a 31% reduction in energy usage and a 38% improvement in packet loss ratio [5].

   EE-IoT is an energy-efficient communication protocol that utilizes current WiFi infrastructure to reduce NB-IoT service charges while ensuring minimal power usage. IoT devices utilize an asymmetric PHY architecture to communicate using AP subcarriers at reduced sampling rates. A prototype exhibited compatibility with 24 devices, achieving uplink and downlink rates above 125 and 187 kbps, respectively [6].

   The Internet of Things (IoT) encounters obstacles such as devie malfunctions, battery exhaustion, and wireless interference. To improve dependability while reducing power consumption, we present four optimization strategies utilizing mixed integer linear programming (MILP). Our methodologies attain up to 60% energy conservation while guaranteeing effective and dependable IoT data transfer [7].

   This document delineates technologies aimed at improving the efficiency and security of IoT monitoring networks. It advocates for adaptive filtering, compression, and encryption of signal and video data, employing a signal- based methodology for compact coding. Disposable ciphers guarantee safe transmission, while efficient in terms of energy processing minimizes data flow and computational requirements for dependable, high-capacity connectivity [8].

   This study examines current advancements in energy- efficient wireless networking within the framework of big data. It examines methodologies for overseeing data collecting, connection, storage, and computing, while also utilizing big data analytics to improve network efficiency. The research further delineates unresolved concerns and prospective avenues for future investigation [9].

   Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) encounter energy limitations stemming from communication operations such as MAC protocols, routing, and channel scheduling. This article evaluates energy-efficient tactics by examining eight optimization methodologies. Research indicates that cross- layer energy policies surpass homogenous models, providing insights for enhancing Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) performance via better channel management and routing techniques [10].

   LightIoT is a safe and lightweight communication method for IoT-enabled healthcare equipment. It guarantees dependable data transfer via initialization, pairing, and authentication stages. LightIoT safeguards biological data against hostile attacks by reducing computational and transmission overhead. Statistical findings demonstrate its robustness, efficiency, and resilience relative to current security methodologies [11].

   This study presents a defect detection and corrected error strategy for IoT-based smart city systems, employing redundant integer computation to provide minimal complexity, delay tolerance, and energy-efficient data transmission. In comparison to existing solutions, the suggested solution enhances packet loss rate and delivery delay, hence improving data transmission quality in smart city networks [12].

   The worldwide web of Things (IoT) interlinks intelligent devices, each equipped with sensors and microprocessors, frequently encountering difficulties with low power and lossy networks (LLNs). The Routing Protocol for Low- Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) was created to tackle this issue. This work presents a routing and transmission power control method for a dependable, energy-efficient, cost- effective RPL-based IoT system [13].

   This paper presents an energy-efficient secured data transmission paradigm for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) to mitigate unwanted access and malevolent nodes. It presents an authentication technique for sensor validation and evaluates cryptographic algorithms (AES, DES, Triple DES, RC4, and Blowfish). Findings indicate that Blowfish is the best green algorithm [14].

   SpEED-IoT is a spectrum-aware, energy-efficient multi- hop routing protocol for communications between devices in Internet of Things networks. It employs a radio environment map (REM) to optimize routes, channels, and transmission power, while safeguarding licensed incumbents, conserving energy for IoT devices, improving data speeds, and assuring equity in multi-hop settings [15].

3. METHODOLOGY

   This section delineates the approach employed to examine energy-efficient data transfer inside IoT networks. The study methodology is structured to systematically evaluate energy conservation methods, emphasizing data processing, data gathering, and communication tactics. The technique comprises many essential processes, each targeting a particular facet of energy efficiency in IoT networks.

   Figure 1 Achieving efficient energy-aware security in IoT networks

   1. Data Collection:

      The initial phase of our technique entailed data collecting, encompassing the acquisition of information on energy usage trends, network designs, and communication protocols inside IoT networks. We concentrated on both theoretical information from scholarly literature and empirical data from actual IoT implementations. The data acquisition procedure encompassed.

      • Sensor Data: Data was gathered from IoT sensors installed in many settings, including smart agriculture, healthcare, and industrial automation. This data encompassed characteristics like as power usage, data transfer speeds, and network latency.

      • Network Traffic Data: We examined network traffic patterns to comprehend the data flow across IoT devices, edge nodes, and central servers. This enabled us to pinpoint bottlenecks and inefficiencies in data transmission.

      • Energy Consumption Metrics: We collected data on the energy usage of internet of things in multiple states (active, idle, sleep) to assess the effectiveness of different energy-saving strategies.

      • Protocol Analysis: We assessed the efficacy of several communication protocols, including MQTT, CoAP, and LPWAN, regarding energy economy, dependability, and scalability.

      • Environmental Factors: We evaluated environmental variables such as temperature, humidity, and network congestion that may influence energy usage and communication efficacy.

   2. Data Processing:

      After data collection, the subsequent phase was data processing, encompassing the cleaning, organization, and analysis of the data to derive significant insights. The data processing procedures encompassed.

      • Data Cleaning: We eliminated any extraneous or unnecessary data to guarantee the precision of our analysis. This involved eliminating incomplete or corrupted data points.

      • Data Aggregation: We compiled data from several sources to construct a complete dataset. This enabled us to examine energy usage trends across various IoT apps and network configurations.

      • Data Analysis: We employed statistical and machine learning methodologies to examine the data. This involved recognizing patterns, correlations, and anomalies in energy usage. We examined the effects of various duty cycle arrangements on energy consumption in IoT networks.

   3. Simulation Setup:

      To assess the efficacy of several energy-saving methodologies, we established simulation environments utilizing renowned network simulators like NS-3 and OMNeT++. The simulation configuration encompassed the subsequent phases.

      • Network Modeling: We developed models of IoT networks, encompassing sensor nodes, edge devices, and central servers. The models were created to replicate actual IoT implementations in fields such as agriculture, healthcare, and industrial automation.

      • Parameter Configuration: We adjusted many factors, including duty cycle intervals, data transmission speeds, and edge computing functionalities, to evaluate alternative energy conservation techniques.

      • Scenario Design: We developed many simulation situations to assess the efficacy of energy-efficient methods under diverse settings. We created a smart agricultural system in which IoT sensors monitor soil moisture levels and relay data to a single server.

   4. Simulation Execution:

      Upon establishing the simulation environment, we conducted simulations to assess the efficacy of several energy-saving strategies. The procedure of doing the simulation encompassed

      • Baseline Testing: Initially, we conducted baseline simulations devoid of any energy-saving strategies to create a reference for energy usage.

      • Technique Testing: Subsequently, we evaluated several energy conservation methods, including duty cycling, data aggregation, compute at the edge, and adaptive data rates. Each approach was assessed for its influence on energy usage, network latency, and info accuracy.

      • Performance Metrics: We gathered performance measurements, including overall energy usage, data transmission efficiency, and network latency, to evaluate the efficacy of various strategies.

      • Error Rate Measurement: We analyzed packet loss and retransmission rates to assess the influence

        of energy-efficient approaches on data integrity and dependability.

   5. Data Analysis and Interpretation:

      Subsequent to doing the simulations, we evaluated the outcomes to ascertain the efficacy of diverse energy conservation methods. The process of data analysis and interpretation encompassed.

      • Comparative Analysis: We analyzed the efficacy of several energy-saving measures to ascertain the most efficient tactics for minimizing energy usage in IoT networks.

      • Trade-off Analysis: We examined the trade-offs involving energy efficiency and several performance indicators, including latency and data accuracy. This enabled us to ascertain appropriate setups for various IoT applications.

      • Insight Generation: Our investigation yielded insights into the implementation of energy-efficient approaches in practical IoT networks. We found instances where edge computing may substantially decrease energy usage while maintaining data accuracy.

      • Cost-Benefit Evaluation: We evaluated the prospective cost reductions attained by energy- efficient methods, taking into account hardware constraints and implementation expenses.

   6. Validation and Refinement:

      The concluding phase of our process was validation and refinement, during which we corroborated our findings and enhanced our models depending on the outcomes. This phase encompassed

      • Model Validation: We corroborated our simulation models by juxtaposing the findings with empirical data from IoT implementations. This facilitated the verification of the precision and dependability of our results.

      • Technique Refinement: We enhanced the energy- saving approaches to augment their efficacy based on the validation outcomes. We modified duty cycle intervals and data aggregation methods to enhance energy efficiency.

      • Final Recommendations: Based on the insights gained from our analysis, we provided final recommendations for implementing energy- efficient data communication in IoT networks.

      • Scalability Assessment: We evaluated the efficacy of the suggested strategies in extensive IoT installations and discovered some scaling constraints.

   7. Equations:

   The energy efficiency of IoT networks may be quantified by the total energy consumed by a device

   during a designated time period to retrieve data inside an IoT network, as expressed by the following equation.

   E = (Pactive) * (Tactive) + (Pidle) * (Tidle) Where:

   E is total energy consumption. Active current consumption

   • (Pactive) is active state power consumption.

   • (Tactive) is the time in the active state.

   • (Pidle): power consumption at idle.

   • (Tidle): time spent in an idle state

   The essential method for attaining energy efficiency is minimizing the power per state and the duration spent in each state, hence inverting the equation. Techniques such as duty cycling diminish (Tactive) and adaptive data rates decrease (Pactive) to improve efficiency. When tailored to particular IoT applications, these factors can facilitate energy-efficient solutions for IoT devices. This equation and its modifications can also be resolved on a network-wide scale, including the expenses of transmission overhead, data processing, and energy loss due to interference. It offers valuable information into whether each device should expend additional energy to enhance performance or whether this will confer an advantage to the system overall.

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

   1. Result:

   This section delineates the results of our investigation on energy-efficient data transmission inside IoT networks. The analysis evaluates the effects of several strategies, such as duty cycling, data aggregation, edge computing, and adaptive data rates, on energy consumption, latency, network efficiency, and data correctness. A comparative assessment identifies the most efficacious strategies for practical applications.

   1. Baseline Energy Consumption Analysis:

      Before implementing any energy optimization strategies, we performed baseline energy consumption assessments across several IoT applications. The objective was to ascertain the energy consumption of IoT devices during standard operational settings in the absence of energy-saving measures

      1. Findings from baseline analysis:

         • High energy consumption in real-time applications

           – IoT devices in industrial automation and healthcare monitoring exhibited much higher energy consumption owing to frequent data transfer.

         • Lower energy consumption in intermittent transmission applications Smart home systems shown reduced energy consumption due to infrequent data transmission by devices.

           Table 1 Baseline Energy Consumption of IoT Devices

           IoT Application	Avg. Energy Consumption per Node (mJ)	Latency (ms)	Data Accuracy (%)
           Smart Agriculture	250	80	99.2
           Healthcare Monitoring	310	60	99.5
           Industrial Automation	400	45	99.8
           Smart Home Systems	180	95	98.5

      2. Interpretation:

         • Industrial automation has the highest energy use owing to the instantaneous nature of data transfer.

         • Smart home systems exhibited little energy consumption due to infrequent data transmission.

         • Healthcare monitoring and smart agriculture varied based on network activities.

   2. Impact of Duty Cycling on Energy Savings:

   Duty cycling is an efficient method whereby IoT devices switch between active and sleep states to conserve energy. We assessed the effects of varying duty cycle percentages on energy usage and latency.

   Table 2 Energy Savings with Duty Cycling

   Duty Cycle Percentage	Energy Savings (%)	Increase in Latency (ms)
   10% (Low Duty Cycle)	50	100
   30% (Medium Duty Cycle)	35	60
   50% (High Duty Cycle)	20	30

   • Cluster-based aggregation yielded moderate savings of 30%, accompanied by a marginal increase in data loss.

   • Simple averaging proved to be less successful owing to possible flaws in the aggregation of data points.

   Multiplex is the optimal solution for extensive IoT implementations where energy saving must be prioritized without compromising data precision.

   D. Benefits of Edge Computing:

   Edge computing transfers processed data from server clustes to local edge nodes, therefore decreasing energy usage and transmission latency.

   Table 4 Energy Savings with Edge Computing

   IoT Application	Energy Savings (%)	Processing Overhead (mJ)
   Smart Agriculture	30	5
   Healthcare Monitoring	35	8
   Industrial Automation	40	12

   1. Findings:

      • Industrial automation had the greatest advantage (40%) from edge computing, since real-time data processing alleviated transmission burdens.

      • Smart agriculture and healthcare monitoring demonstrated considerable energy savings.

      • Processing overhead has escalated owing to the computing requirements at the edge nodes.

   E. Adaptive Data Transmission for Energy Optimization:

   C. Effectiveness of Data Aggregation:

   Data aggregation minimizes duplicate transmissions by consolidating like data before transmission to central computers. Various aggregation methods were evaluated for their effects on energy conservation and data loss.

   Table 3 Impact of Data Aggregation

   Aggregation Method	Energy Savings (%)	Data Loss (%)
   Simple Averaging	25	2.1
   Cluster-Based Aggregation	30	1.5
   AI-Assisted Aggregation	35	1.2

   1. Analysis:

      • AI-assisted aggregation achieved the greatest energy savings (35%) while sustaining little data loss (1.2%).

   Adaptive data transmission flexibly modifies data rates according to network circumstances. It facilitates the minimization of superfluous data transfer while preserving elevated accuracy.

   .

   Table 5 Adaptive vs. Fixed Transmission Rates

   Transmission Strategy	Energy Savings (%)	Data Accuracy (%)
   Fixed Transmission Rate	0	99.5
   Adaptive Transmission	45	99.2

   F. Comparative Analysis of Techniques:

   To determine the best strategy, a comparative analysis of all techniques was conducted.

   Table 6 Comparative Performance of Energy-Efficient Techniques

   Technique	Energy Savings (%)	Latency Impact	Complexity
   Duty Cycling	50	High	Low
   Data Aggregation	30	Low	Medium
   Edge Computing	40	Moderate	High
   Adaptive Data Transmission	45	Minimal	Medium
   Hybrid Approach	60	Balanced	High

   1. Key Insights:

      • Duty cycling had the highest individual energy savings (50%) but suffered from high latency.

      • Adaptive transmission (45%) was efficient while maintaining high accuracy.

      • The hybrid approach combining multiple techniques achieved the highest energy savings (60%).

   2. Discussion:

   The research sought to assess and contrast the efficacy of diverse energy-efficient strategies in IoT networks, emphasizing approaches such as duty cycling, data aggregation, edge computing, and adaptive data rates. Each strategy was evaluated in practical scenarios and simulations to assess its efficacy in minimizing energy usage while preserving network performance.

   1. Duty Cycling:

      Duty cycling has shown to be one of the most efficient techniques for energy conservation, with reductions in energy consumption of up to 50% in some setups. Permitting IoT devices to transition between active, inactive, and sleep modes reduces superfluous power use during idleness. Nonetheless, a significant trade-off is the rise in latency. Devices employing rigorous duty cycle schedules encounter considerable delays in data transfer, which may be unsuitable for time-sensitive applications like healthcare or industrial automation. The findings indicate that moderate duty cycle arrangements are more equitable, providing energy savings while minimizing delay. Consequently, ideal duty cycle schedules must be customized to the application's individual requirements, taking into account the equilibrium between energy consumption and the promptness of data transmission.

   2. Data Aggregation:

      Data aggregation significantly decreased duplicate transmissions inside the network, resulting in energy savings of up to 30%. This technology consolidates several data points into a single transfer, therefore markedly diminishing the necessity for frequent connection between devices and central computers. This strategy, however, results in minimum data loss, particularly in aggregation techniques like as cluster-based and AI-assisted aggregation. These methods demonstrated significant efficacy in scenarios characterized by substantial data redundancy, including

      smart agriculture and environmental monitoring. The capacity of these strategies to preserve data fidelity while minimizing power consumption renders them optimal for extensive implementations.

   3. Edge Computing:

      Edge computing proved especially advantageous for applications necessitating real-time data processing, including industrial automation and healthcare monitoring. By delegating functions from sensor nodes to edge devices, it realized energy savings of up to 40%. The computational load on edge nodes must not be overlooked. These gadgets need greater processing power, potentially resulting in heightened energy consumption at the edge. Nonetheless, edge computing lowered the total energy demand on sensors, demonstrating its benefits in high-data-rate applications where transmission reduction is essential. Future research may concentrate on enhancing edge computing architectures for resource-limited devices, guaranteeing feasibility in networks with low-power sensors.

   4. Adaptive Data Rates:

      The introduction of adaptive data rates automatically modified transmission frequency according to network conditions, resulting in energy savings of up to 45%. This approach guarantees that devices transfer data just when required, preventing superfluous transmissions that deplete energy. Adaptive data rates optimize the equilibrium between network efficiency and data precision, particularly in contexts with variable network circumstances. This method demonstrates significant potential for dynamic IoT applications, where network demand can fluctuate fast, such as in smart home systems or urban sensor networks.

   5. Hybrid Approach:

      The integration of several energy-efficient strategiesduty cycling, data aggregation, and edge computingresulted in optimal energy reductions, reaching up to 60%. This technique necessitated meticulous evaluation of the related trade-offs. Although energy usage significantly decreased, certain methods such as edge computing heightened the processing requirements on intermediary devices, which may not be viable in many contexts. Data aggregation may lead to small data loss, which, while often minimal in most applications, might provide challenges for use cases deanding high precision.

   6. Hybrid Approach:

      This section delineates the comprehensive results derived from the assessment of energy-efficient methodologies in IoT networks, succeeded by a comparison study to evaluate their relative efficacy and trade-offs. The approaches reviewed encompass duty cycling, data aggregation, edge computing, and adaptive data rates, with each methodology assessed across several IoT application scenarios.

      1. Performance Metrics:

   The performance measurements gathered throughout the investigation were overall energy usage, network latency, data correctness, and transmission efficiency. The subsequent table encapsulates the principal performance outcomes for each approach.

   Table 7 Performance Metrics for Energy-Efficient Techniques

   Technique	Energy Savings (%)	Latency Increase (ms)	Data Accuracy (%)	Transmission Efficiency (%)
   Duty Cycling (Low)	50%	100 ms	98.5	80%
   Data Aggregation	30%	20 ms	98.8	90%
   Edge Computing	40%	15 ms	99.0	85%
   Adaptive Data Rates	45%	10 ms	99.2	92%

5. CONCLUSION

This research investigated energy-efficient data transfer approaches in IoT networks, emphasizing strategies such as duty cycling, data aggregation, edge computing, and adaptive data rates. Duty cycling resulted in the greatest energy reduction of 50%, although with higher delay, while data aggregation minimized duplicated transmissions, yielding a 30% energy savings with little data loss. Edge computing enhanced real-time processing, resulting in a 40% reduction in energy use, although with increased computational overhead. Adaptive data rates provide dynamically modified transmissions, resulting in a 45% reduction in costs while preserving accuracy.

A hybrid methodology integrating both strategies yielded optimal energy efficiency (up to 60%), reconciling energy conservation with network performance. Future research should concentrate on AI-driven optimization for dynamic energy management and technological breakthroughs to improve device efficiency. With the expansion of IoT, the integration of energy-efficient solutions will be essential for sustainability. This study provides insights for academics and policymakers to create more sustainable and scalable IoT networks, assuring enduring operational efficiency with low environmental effect.

REFERENCES

[1]. Fathy, Y. and Barnaghi, P., 2019. Quality-based and energy-efficient data communication for the internet of things networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(6), pp.10318-10331.

[2]. Hussein, A.M., Idrees, A.K. and Couturier, R., 2022. Distributed energyefficient data reduction approach based on prediction and compression to reduce data transmission in IoT networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 35(15), p.e5282.

[3]. Izaddoost, A. and Siewierski, M., 2020. Energy efficient data transmission in iot platforms. Procedia Computer Science, 175, pp.387-394.

[4]. Orsino, A., Araniti, G., Militano, L., Alonso-Zarate, J., Molinaro, A. and Iera, A., 2016. Energy efficient IoT data collection in smart cities exploiting D2D communications. Sensors, 16(6), p.836.

[5]. Gupta, D., Wadhwa, S., Rani, S., Khan, Z. and Boulila, W., 2023. EEDC: An Energy Efficient Data Communication Scheme Based on New Routing Approach in Wireless Sensor Networks for Future IoT Applications. Sensors, 23(21), p.8839.

[6]. Pirayesh, H., Sangdeh, P.K. and Zeng, H., 2019, April. EE-IoT: An energy-efficient IoT communication scheme for WLANs. In IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (pp. 361-369). IEEE.

[7]. Hussein Al-Kadhim, H.M. and Al-Raweshidy, H.S., 2019. Energy efficient and reliable transport of data in cloud-based IoT. IEEE Access, 7, pp.64641-64650.

[8]. Hussein Shevchuk, B., Geraimchuk, M.D., Ivakhiv, O. and Brayko, Y., 2021. Highly information and energy-efficient monitoring data transmission in iot networks. Journal of mobile multimedia, pp.465- 498.

[9]. Cao, X., Liu, L., Cheng, Y. and Shen, X., 2017. Towards energy- efficient wireless networking in the big data era: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(1), pp.303-332.

[10]. Dhabliya, D., Soundararajan, R., Selvarasu, P., Balasubramaniam, M.S., Rajawat, A.S., Goyal, S.B., Raboaca, M.S., Mihaltan, T.C., Verma, C. and Suciu, G., 2022. Energy-efficient network protocols and resilient data transmission schemes for wireless sensor NetworksAn experimental survey. Energies, 15(23), p.8883..

[11]. Jan, M.A., Khan, F., Mastorakis, S., Adil, M., Akbar, A. and Stergiou, N., 2021. LightIoT: Lightweight and secure communication for energy-efficient IoT in health informatics. IEEE transactions on green communications and networking, 5(3), pp.1202-1211.

[12]. Mahapatra, C., Sheng, Z., Leung, V.C. and Stouraitis, T., 2015, June. A reliable and energy efficient IoT data transmission scheme for smart cities based on redundant residue based error correction coding. In 2015 12th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking-Workshops (SECON Workshops) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[13]. Mahmud, M.A., Abdelgawad, A. and Yelamarthi, K., 2017, May. Energy efficient routing for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. In 2017 IEEE international conference on electro information technology (EIT) (pp. 442-446). IEEE.

[14]. Singh, A.K., Alshehri, M., Bhushan, S., Kumar, M., Alfarraj, O. and Pardarshani, K.R., 2021. Secure and energy efficient data transmission model for WSN. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 27(3), pp.761-769.

[15]. Debroy, S., Samanta, P., Bashir, A. and Chatterjee, M., 2019. SpEED- IoT: Spectrum aware energy efficient routing for device-to-device IoT communication. Future Generation Computer Systems, 93, pp.833- 848.